2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2014.08.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring neural dysfunction in ‘clinical high risk’ for psychosis: A quantitative review of fMRI studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
34
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 102 publications
4
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The majority of these studies show reduced activity in multiple frontal and parietal regions, a pattern that has also been reported in a meta-analysis of 10 fMRI studies (Fusar-Poli, 2012) and a quantitative review of 32 fMRI studies of CHR (both of which included a heterogeneous mix of executive function, memory, and other tasks)(Dutt et al, 2015). The quantitative review by Dutt et al in 2015 included a pooled analysis of 5 studies of the N-back WM task, which showed reduced activity in CHR in the inferior parietal lobule.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 55%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The majority of these studies show reduced activity in multiple frontal and parietal regions, a pattern that has also been reported in a meta-analysis of 10 fMRI studies (Fusar-Poli, 2012) and a quantitative review of 32 fMRI studies of CHR (both of which included a heterogeneous mix of executive function, memory, and other tasks)(Dutt et al, 2015). The quantitative review by Dutt et al in 2015 included a pooled analysis of 5 studies of the N-back WM task, which showed reduced activity in CHR in the inferior parietal lobule.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…While recent meta-analytic studies of CHR to date report a general pattern of hypoactivity in executive regions in CHR (Dutt et al, 2015; Fusar-Poli, 2012), a large body of work in persons at familial high risk for psychosis and those with schizophrenia suggests that both hypo- and hyperactivity are observed in these populations, with regions of hyperactivity seen as potentially compensatory for deficits in other regions (Minzenberg et al, 2009; Seidman et al, 2006; Thermenos et al, 2013; Whitfield-Gabrieli et al, 2009). The medication-naïve CHR participants in this study were more impaired than the medication-exposed group (e.g., lower intellectual ability and A-CPT interference task performance, lower social and role function, higher SIPS grandiosity scores and higher lifetime drug use), yet they were able perform the N-back task at a level equal to controls.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations