Exploring motivations and resistances for implementing shared decision‐making in clinical practice: A systematic review based on a structure–process–outcome model

Abstract

Objective: Shared decision-making (SDM) as a multicollaborative approach is vital for facilitating patient-centred care. Considering the limited clinical practice, we attempted to synthesize the motivations and resistances, and investigate their mutual relationships for advancing the implementation of SDM.Methods: A comprehensive systematic review using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis guidelines was performed. 'Shared decision making' was searched as the mesh term through PubMed, Web of Science and EBSCO from 2000 to 2021, and the quality of literature was appraised using the QualSyst Tool. Motivations and resistances were categorized based on content analysis and the 'structure-process-outcome' model.Results: From 8319 potential citations, 105 were included, comprising 53 qualitative studies (the average quality score is 0.92) and 52 quantitative studies (the average quality score is 0.95). A total of 42 categories of factors were identified into 11 themes and further grouped into three dimensions: structure, process and outcome.The structure dimension comprised six themes (71.43%), the process dimension contained four themes (11.01%) and the outcome dimension covered only one theme. Across all categories, decision-making time and patients' decision preparedness in the process dimension were the most reported, followed by physicians' communication skills and health care environment in the structure dimension.Analysis of implementation of SDM among various types of diseases showed that more influencing factors were extracted from chronic diseases and unspecified disease decisions. Conclusions:The major determinants for the implementation of SDM are focused on the structural dimension, which challenges the health systems of both developed and low-and middle-income countries. Furthermore, we consider it important to

Patient Experiences of Communication with Healthcare Professionals on Their Healthcare Management around Chronic Respiratory Diseases

“…As there are evidenced benefits to person-centered care within the context of chronic condition self-management [30], we should take into account the persons' day-to-day experience, knowledge, and action over time in managing their health, to strengthen and improve a person's control over their health. Sharing knowledge and decision making is also vital for facilitating patient-centered care [31], and improves the relationship between patients and HCPs.…”

Ethics of Nudging in the COVID-19 Crisis and the Necessary Return to the Principles of Shared Decision Making: A Critical Review

“…More implicit psychological parameters might influence the occurrence of SDM, and unless these are specified, one has to conclude that SDM can be performed with any patient. Another review found that trusting physicians increased the probability of engaging in SDM although unconditional trust should be regarded as negative as a collaborative relationship has to be established in SDM [ 153 ]. Also, patient characteristics like better physical health, higher self-efficacy, higher decision-making skills, younger age, and higher health literacy were associated with higher participation in SDM.…”

“…Ineffective SDM was characterized by a lack of humanistic concern. Organizational support, like the financial compensation of additional time, is needed for physicians to implement SDM [ 153 ]. Physicians were less supportive of SDM in situations where they thought that well-evidenced guidelines favored one treatment over another [ 154 ].…”

Brownfield redevelopment evaluation based on structure-process-outcome theory and continuous ordered weighted averaging operator-topology method

“…In the process of brownfield redevelopment, capital investment (e.g., environmental remediation and renovation construction costs), matching measures (e.g., regional planning, government policy support and supervision, and management), basic conditions of construction and renovation enterprises, and public opinion guidance (e.g., access to environmental information) significantly affect the process of brownfield redevelopment. Therefore, coordinating the relevant interests of all participants is the key to the success of the project 28 .…”