Interspeech 2020 2020
DOI: 10.21437/interspeech.2020-3085
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring MMSE Score Prediction Using Verbal and Non-Verbal Cues

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although we have not discuss here the results from this experiment in detail for the sake of brevity, we report that the two methods based on averaging achieved better performance than the median-based fusion, in terms of RMSE. Please note, Farzana et al [15] used the median-based fusion in their study. Amongst the simple label averaging and Pearson's score weighted averaging for label fusion, we found that the latter yielded a smaller RMSE, when labels from top-10 models were fused.…”
Section: Selection Of Fusion Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Although we have not discuss here the results from this experiment in detail for the sake of brevity, we report that the two methods based on averaging achieved better performance than the median-based fusion, in terms of RMSE. Please note, Farzana et al [15] used the median-based fusion in their study. Amongst the simple label averaging and Pearson's score weighted averaging for label fusion, we found that the latter yielded a smaller RMSE, when labels from top-10 models were fused.…”
Section: Selection Of Fusion Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 1 summarizes the results for the two tasks of the ADReSS challenge as per the proceedings of the Interspeech 2020 conference [15]- [27]. In addition to the scores, we also provide the ranking for each participating team based on the performance of their proposed model relative to the challenge baseline for the test partition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Previous work has been done using the ADReSS dataset. Some researchers only participated in the AD classification task (Edwards et al, 2020 ; Pompili et al, 2020 ; Yuan et al, 2020 ), others only participated in the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) prediction task (Farzana and Parde, 2020 ), and others participated in both tasks (Balagopalan et al, 2020 ; Cummins et al, 2020 ; Koo et al, 2020 ; Luz et al, 2020 ; Martinc and Pollak, 2020 ; Pappagari et al, 2020 ; Rohanian et al, 2020 ; Sarawgi et al, 2020 ; Searle et al, 2020 ; Syed et al, 2020 ). The best performance on the AD classification task was achieved by Yuan et al ( 2020 ), who obtained an accuracy of 89.6% on the test set using linguistic features extracted from the transcripts, as well as encoded pauses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%