Exploring Mistakes and Failures in Social Marketing: The Inside Story

Abstract

Background: Social marketing successes are relatively well-documented, but mistakes and failures in the field are not. When mistakes and failures are reported, they are usually on an ad hoc basis, as opposed to a systematic gathering of evidence. This paper is the second half of a two-part research study that aims to understand the perceptions of social marketing professionals with regard to mistakes and failures in the field. Focus: This article is related to research and evaluation of the social marketing field. Research Question: What are the perceptions of the social marketing community regarding mistakes and failures in the field? Importance to the field: A greater understanding of mistakes and failures in the social marketing field will assist practitioners to assess their own shortcomings, address causes of mistakes and failures, and improve program outcomes. Method: This research is qualitative and exploratory, with a constructivist, grounded theory methodology. Surveys were completed by 100 social marketing community members. Survey data was analyzed and coded using SPSS software and Microsoft Excel. Results: According to the analyzed survey data, the social marketing community believes that inadequate research, poor strategy development, and mismanagement of stakeholders are the most common mistakes made by social marketers. Further, weak evaluation and monitoring is considered to be the “least well-managed” program element. Poor strategy development, external influences, and poorly designed program and behavioral objectives are considered to be the primary reasons for social marketing program failure. Recommendations for research or practice: Future research may explore the extent to which external influences lead to social marketing program success or failure, particularly in comparison to mistakes made by social marketers. Additionally, practitioners should be aware of and develop strategies to mitigate common mistakes and failures in order to improve program outcomes. Limitations: The 100 social marketing professionals who responded to the survey are not representative of the global social marketing community. Further, responses were based on self-report rather than direct observation, which may make them more susceptible to bias.

The social marketing paradox: challenges and opportunities for the discipline

“…Andreasen ( 2002 ) considered the identity of social marketing discipline to be poor, and others noted that it had not improved some 17 years later (Kassirer et al, 2019 ). Our findings suggest that social marketing has a strong identity, as evidenced by the broad applicability and implementation of social marketing from upstream to downstream social issues (Cook et al, 2021 ). However, the interviewees strongly echoed the field's poor branding, with six of the nine raising this as a serious concern.…”

Social marketing at 50: towards an epistemological expansion of the discipline to embrace diversity. A Viewpoint

“…Strategies and solutions Acknowledge the role of politics, religion and external forces that disproportionately affect social marketing practice in the Global South and influence how "social change" is defined Increase visibility of "hidden" social marketing efforts through academic-practitioner partnerships and the chronicling and publication of successes (White, 2018) as well as "failures" (Akbar et al, 2021a;Cook et al, 2020Cook et al, , 2021 Increase the use of the label "social marketing" to describe efforts that meet the criteria for social marketing practice (Deshpande, 2019;Kassirer et al, 2019;Lee, 2020) as outlined by iSMA (International Social Marketing Association, 2017)…”

Improving theory use in social marketing: the TITE four-step theory application process

“…Providing robust evidence presents a significant challenge for the social marketing discipline (Gordon et al , 2008). While there is evidence to support the effectiveness of social marketing (Kubacki et al , 2015b; Carins and Rundle-Thiele, 2014; Truong, 2014; Dietrich et al , 2016; Xia et al , 2016; Firestone et al , 2017), there are also examples of interventions that have failed to achieve the desired outcomes (Wymer, 2011; Cook et al , 2021; Helmig and Thaler, 2010). The complex and multidisciplinary nature of social marketing complicates evaluations of effectiveness (Helmig and Thaler, 2010; Gordon et al , 2008).…”