Exploring methodological innovation in the social sciences: the body in digital environments and the arts

Jewitt, Carey; Xambó, Anna; Price, Sara

doi:10.1080/13645579.2015.1129143

Cited by 26 publications

(22 citation statements)

References 18 publications

(11 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…According to Jewitt, Xambo &. Price [29], methodological innovation has been advancing leap and bound particularly in the social science discipline.…”

Section: Methodological Improvementmentioning

confidence: 99%

Untitled

2019

JSSH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper explores the plausible challenges of knowledge diffusion, particularly the transmission of novel academic findings to their ultimate utilization or adoption in the industry. The paper focuses on the more restrained but not less important issues that impede such development and proposes that solution to the lack of reliability in measuring knowledge diffusion hinges on methodological improvement; the disinclination of human factor in technology acceptance could be understood and potentially rectified with the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) instrument; and the hindrance of less-accessible medium for knowledge diffusion could be resolved with a more simplified medium, specifically the Online-Video-Platform (OVP) journal.

show abstract

“…According to Jewitt, Xambo &. Price [29], methodological innovation has been advancing leap and bound particularly in the social science discipline.…”

Section: Methodological Improvementmentioning

confidence: 99%

Untitled

2019

JSSH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Understanding bodily knowing through research on and with the body is a founding feature of the authors' work within multimodality (Jewitt et al 2016;Jewitt 2014;Kress et al 2005Kress et al , 2014 and sensory ethnography (Leder Mackley and Pink 2014) especially as articulated in relation to digital communication and interaction . We bring multimodality and sensory methods together to explore touch in response to the methodological challenge of how to understand the changing social landscape of touch, and the need for embodied methods to help gain insight on socially orientated understandings of digital touch.…”

Section: A Multimodal and Sensory Lens On Digital Touch Communicationmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In this way, multimodality raises issues of power and agency, for instance in relation to who can touch. Using multimodality, we are starting to map the emergent dimensions of digital touch and the social conditions and contexts that shape it as well as to characterise people's use of touch for communication with attention to the cultural and social norms and power relations that shape their use (Jewitt 2017).…”

Section: A Multimodal and Sensory Lens On Digital Touch Communicationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Interdisciplinary Explorations of Digital Touch

Jewitt

Price

Mackley

et al. 2019

Human–Computer Interaction Series

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This chapter introduces and reflects on the multimodal, sensory and interdisciplinary methodological stance of this book, and the InTouch project more broadly. We introduce our main framework, which combines multimodality and sensory ethnography. We outline the collaborations and interdisciplinary dialogues that we have engaged with to explore digital touch, and argue that this approach brings different aspects of touch to the fore in ways that are productive for research and design. Finally, the different ways in which we use prototyping to gain access to, and to generate, digital touch experiences and imaginations for the purposes of research is outlined.

show abstract

“…On the other hand, the method is considered neither effective nor efficient, it will be considered not feasible to be implemented and it means that teacher should seek another method which is more effective and efficient (Jewitt, Xambo, & Price, 2016;Litvin, Walkling, & Cormack, 2016;Loomis, Rodriguez, & Tillman, 2008). Such method considered more suitable or less suitable according to the learning objectives achievement.…”

Section: Consideration Underlying the Selection Of Learning Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Implementation of Eclectic Method on Arabic Teaching and Learning

Wekke¹,

Maryam²

2018

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ABSTRACT:Mastering both Arabic learning method and material substance should be done simultaneously. The fact shows that teachers are always facing new method and required to evaluate method they have implemented. In the other hand, they are also experiencing difficulties when implementing the method with no strong mastery of materials. Therefore, the two are should be mastered by teachers simultaneously. This paper discusses at least four considerations to implement eclectic method. The method which is considered having excellence in a time may be considered having shortcoming in another time. The implementation of Arabic language, particularly, is supervised and corrected by the sticking coach directly. Correcting and improving students" ability in Arabic language require a long process, not all incorrectness can be corrected directly, since the improvement of language requires times, stages and coach"s wisdom to motivate and guide the students. Finally, this paper presented that each of the very great number of methods existing, obviously, has its excellences and shortcomings.

show abstract

Exploring methodological innovation in the social sciences: the body in digital environments and the arts

Cited by 26 publications

References 18 publications

Untitled

Untitled

Interdisciplinary Explorations of Digital Touch

Implementation of Eclectic Method on Arabic Teaching and Learning

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About