2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbi.2014.12.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring medical device design and use through layers of Distributed Cognition: How a glucometer is coupled with its context

Abstract: Medical devices are becoming more interconnected and complex, and are increasingly supported by fragmented organizational systems, e.g. through different processes, committees, supporting staff and training regimes. Distributed Cognition has been proposed as a framework for understanding the design and use of medical devices. However, it is not clear that it has the analytic apparatus to support the investigation of such complexities. This paper proposes a framework that introduces concentric layers to DiCoT, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
(85 reference statements)
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Blanford et al (2014) noted that challenges in device usability are minimized before market introduction to patients when incorporating the concept of "work as done" rather than "work as imagined" models of medical device design (fitness for purpose) [19] . In a case study reported by Furniss et al (2015) on the usability of a glucometer, the authors noted that feedback and insight that impacted incremental and non-incremental design decisions came from multiple sources, including traditional verbal reports by users, as well as observations of users [20].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Blanford et al (2014) noted that challenges in device usability are minimized before market introduction to patients when incorporating the concept of "work as done" rather than "work as imagined" models of medical device design (fitness for purpose) [19] . In a case study reported by Furniss et al (2015) on the usability of a glucometer, the authors noted that feedback and insight that impacted incremental and non-incremental design decisions came from multiple sources, including traditional verbal reports by users, as well as observations of users [20].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior to that pivotal study, research was conducted to understand the feasibility of the concept of a vaginal bowel control system. Medical device development involves multiple stages of evolution driven by patient and clinician feedback derived from investigational trial use and standard care delivery [19][20][21]. Feasibility studies are intended to provide initial information about the safety, effectiveness, and acceptance by both patients and clinicians of a new therapy in a small, sample population.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the homecare environment this could involve customising the device to make it look discreet (O'Kane et al, 2015). In the hospital context equipment could be modified beyond the original design intent, as per accounts relating to barcoding systems (Koppel et al, 2008), alarm settings (Watson et al, 2004), physiological monitors (Cook and Woods, 1996) infusion pumps (Obradovich and Woods, 1996) and glucometers (Furniss et al, 2015).…”
Section: Equipment Replacement and Socio-technical Systems (Sts)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, DiCoT has been proven to facilitate the learning of applying the DCog framework (Berndt et al 2014), and recently, a lot of work has been performed in healthcare using the DiCoT methodology (e.g. Furniss et al 2014Furniss et al , 2015Rajkomar and Blandford 2012).…”
Section: Applying Dcog Analyses Within Work Settingsmentioning
confidence: 99%