2023
DOI: 10.1111/jan.15738
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring leadership in health professionals following an industry‐based leadership program: A cross‐sectional survey

Abstract: AimTo evaluate the self‐reported leadership practices and behaviours of health professionals following a leadership program and explore factors that impacted leadership style.DesignAn online cross‐sectional survey was conducted from August to October 2022.MethodsThe survey was disseminated via email to leadership program graduates. The Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire Form—6S was used to measure leadership style.ResultsEighty completed surveys were included in the analysis. Participants scored highest on t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 44 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The MLQ has been constantly improved since its creation to ensure accurate and reliable measurement. While the Dhingra, Srivastava and Srivastava full MLQ has been extensively validated, the empirical base examining the reliability and validity of the abbreviated MLQ -6S especially in different cultural contextual form remains limited (Middleton et al, 2023;Bhageri et al, 2015). Given prior research, EFA was conducted to examine the current study's factor structure and internal consistency.…”
Section: Previous Reliability and Validity Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MLQ has been constantly improved since its creation to ensure accurate and reliable measurement. While the Dhingra, Srivastava and Srivastava full MLQ has been extensively validated, the empirical base examining the reliability and validity of the abbreviated MLQ -6S especially in different cultural contextual form remains limited (Middleton et al, 2023;Bhageri et al, 2015). Given prior research, EFA was conducted to examine the current study's factor structure and internal consistency.…”
Section: Previous Reliability and Validity Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%