Exploring Landscape Perceptions of Bukhansan National Park According to the Degree of Visitors’ Experience

Abstract

This study explores differing landscape perceptions of Bukhansan National Park according to the degree of visitors' familiarity, and discusses the utilization of commonality and diversity of landscape perception in sustainable landscape management. Visitor-employed photography (VEP) was used to capture the overall response to experiencing landscape directly on-site. According to the degree of familiarity of national parks, visitors were recruited into two groups: inexperienced group (the novice group) and experienced group (the veteran group). We collected photographs and photo-logs of liked and disliked landscape from the participants. Additional interviews were conducted to supplement the content of the photo-logs. The objects of landscape were classified into spatial configurations and specific elements. The cognitive process of landscape perception is divided into four stages: perceptual, expressive, interpretative, and symbolic. Emphasizing the narrative aspects of landscape, accepting and interpreting the phenomenon can vary according to an individual's interest and background. We used semantic network analysis to analyze the content of participants' photo-logs. The content at the interpretative level showed that the two groups had very different perceptions of anthropic elements. The novice group emphasized walkability and accessibility, while the veteran group regarded naturalness and historicity as more important. In conclusion, it is a very useful way to analyze the differences of perceptions of two visitors, both the novice group and the veteran group to grasp the positive or negative perceptions of people's impacts on the landscape. Understanding the value of relevant visitors through analysis results is one way to resolve potential conflicts.

Do people prefer natural landscapes? An empirical study in Chile

“…However, most studies have been conducted in developed countries, and Europe in particular, where landscapes as a well as individual characteristics, such as income and education level, differ significantly from those of South American countries. This study is in line with several recent efforts to understand public opinion regarding potential negative effects of natural landscape transformation and the implications this may have for landscape planning (Sevenant and Antrop 2010, Tagliafierro et al 2016, Lee and Son 2017.…”

Valuing Urban Landscape Using Subjective Well-Being Data: Empirical Evidence from Dalian, China

“…However, due to the rapid urbanization and population growth, the urban space in China has been outstretched tremendously in many city areas over the last decades. However, much of the city land has been encroached by residential and commercial development uses, which have significantly misappropriated the green land space of lawn and forestry area [6,7]. This situation has been deteriorated to a degree of threatening the city's sustainable landscape development.…”

Visual Landscape Quality as Viewed from Motorways in Spain

“…The literature on landscape assessment is abundant and includes a wide range of methods. Among them, approaches based on public perception have been used extensively in landscape assessment studies, since they complement approaches based on experts' opinions and are consistent with the ELC [16][17][18][19]. Visual landscape quality is often assessed by assigning specific and easily identifiable and valuable attributes or descriptor variables to the territory or scene using photographs as substitutes for the landscape [20][21][22].…”

“…Ref. [18] adapted the full method, taking into account four of the 14 descriptors to measure landscape quality from rural roads in Spain. Recently, Martín et al [15] applied it to assess landscapes seen from highways, combined with GIS indicators of landscape character.…”