Determinants of Innovative Behaviour 2008
DOI: 10.1057/9780230285736_6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring Knowledge Flows and Losses in the ‘Open Innovation’ Age

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, labels such as core-proprietary information or know-how (Kale et al, 2000) or highly tacit and core (Norman, 2002) describe the subset of knowledge involved in leakage. For example, a firm's ability to generate profits from technology depends on the level of protection it can exert over its core competencies (Hamel and Prahalad, 1990;Trott, 2008). Conversely, core knowledge can be absorbed from another party, just as a partner can absorb core knowledge from a focal firm (Hamel, 1991).…”
Section: Prior Literature On Knowledge Types In Knowledge Leakage Promentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Hence, labels such as core-proprietary information or know-how (Kale et al, 2000) or highly tacit and core (Norman, 2002) describe the subset of knowledge involved in leakage. For example, a firm's ability to generate profits from technology depends on the level of protection it can exert over its core competencies (Hamel and Prahalad, 1990;Trott, 2008). Conversely, core knowledge can be absorbed from another party, just as a partner can absorb core knowledge from a focal firm (Hamel, 1991).…”
Section: Prior Literature On Knowledge Types In Knowledge Leakage Promentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both tacit and codified knowledge may leak through these suppliers when they interact with others; i.e. these firms systematically engage in "non-exclusive" relationships (Trott, 2008).…”
Section: Research Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This drawback is particularly critical for firms that are highly involved in NPD because the firm gives up temporary monopoly of new products and thus the erosion of monopoly profits increases. Moreover, licensing may cause the loss of control over core competencies because of unintended knowledge spillover (Trott, ). The risk of counterfeiting and imitation, and the resulting weakening of the competitive position, is more serious for innovative firms whose performance is likely to depend highly on technological “crown jewels” (Kline, ).…”
Section: Conceptual Framework and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Strategic management literature highly regards the importance of learning in a joint activity. Firms with intentions to learn focus their energies in search of relevant information (Trott, 2008). Organizational learning in a collaborative project has been reasoned to knowledge acquisition, innovations and elevated competitiveness (Jiang et al , 2016); (Kanwal et al , 2019).…”
Section: Literature and Hypotheses Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Losing commercially viable knowledge resources adversely affect focal firm’s competitiveness (Alghail et al , 2021a); (Abbas and Alghail, 2021) and its centrality in the alliance, which further challenge its prospects of future networking and existence (Jiang et al , 2016); (Shi et al , 2019). How to curtail propensities of knowledge leakage has remained a concern of utmost importance for researchers and practitioners equally and is aimed in this study (Alghail et al , 2021a); (Abbas and Alghail, 2021); (Durst and Zieba, 2019); (Trott, 2008). The systematic review of literature highlights the following important research gaps.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%