2006
DOI: 10.1108/14502190610750162
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring intertextuality: Young people reading alcohol advertising

Abstract: This paper explores the use of intertextuality in advertising texts. It identifies that there are two distinctive methods of researching meanings found in and around advertisements. The two methods are textual strategy and interpretive practice. The results of a phenomenological study of the interpretive practices are shown. The empirical study was completed with young people from the United Kingdom who used interpretive practices to form meaning from an alcohol advertisement. The study reveals that young audi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, through the questions in Table IV, respondents made a self-evaluation of the importance level of scopophilia (one item based on the definition of Soukup, 2009), self-sexualization (three item generated from the definition of Coy and Garner, 2010) and glamour (four item based also in the definition of Coy and Garner, 2010). In step 3, this evaluation was complemented with a qualitative content analysis of the ads/endorser using an interpretative approach (Kenyon, 2006). The endorser awareness was also confirmed (celebrity vs unknown endorser/consumer). Finally, in step 4, the respondent’s response towards the print ad was assessed by the following measures using five-points Likert scales: (Aad), attitude towards the product, (Ab), Purchase Intention (PI), brand glamour, brand reputation, consumer-brand self-congruence, brand image and WTP (in euros).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, through the questions in Table IV, respondents made a self-evaluation of the importance level of scopophilia (one item based on the definition of Soukup, 2009), self-sexualization (three item generated from the definition of Coy and Garner, 2010) and glamour (four item based also in the definition of Coy and Garner, 2010). In step 3, this evaluation was complemented with a qualitative content analysis of the ads/endorser using an interpretative approach (Kenyon, 2006). The endorser awareness was also confirmed (celebrity vs unknown endorser/consumer). Finally, in step 4, the respondent’s response towards the print ad was assessed by the following measures using five-points Likert scales: (Aad), attitude towards the product, (Ab), Purchase Intention (PI), brand glamour, brand reputation, consumer-brand self-congruence, brand image and WTP (in euros).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In step 3, this evaluation was complemented with a qualitative content analysis of the ads/endorser using an interpretative approach (Kenyon, 2006). The endorser awareness was also confirmed (celebrity vs unknown endorser/consumer).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%