2011
DOI: 10.1177/1527154411417721
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring Infection Prevention

Abstract: Health care–associated infections (HAIs) are common and costly patient safety problems that are largely preventable. As a result, numerous policy changes have recently taken place including mandatory reporting and lack of reimbursement for HAIs. A qualitative approach was used to obtain dense description and gain insights about the current practice of infection prevention in California. Twenty-three in-depth, semistructured interviews were conducted at six acute care hospitals. Content analysis revealed 4 majo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings from IPs practicing in acute care hospitals across the United States reinforce those of an earlier statewide study conducted by our team, in which 25 health care professionals in California described how mandatory reporting of HAI data drew needed attention to IPs but created frustration because of unfair comparisons among hospitals and an increased workload for which electronic surveillance systems did not fully compensate. 21 The findings also confirm that, nationally, as was first noted in reports from that earlier California study, infection prevention has become an organizational goal toward which IPs lead interdisciplinary teams and that additional layers present in the new reporting structures can act as barriers to success. As in the present study, the California informants influenced practice through data feedback and education.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…These findings from IPs practicing in acute care hospitals across the United States reinforce those of an earlier statewide study conducted by our team, in which 25 health care professionals in California described how mandatory reporting of HAI data drew needed attention to IPs but created frustration because of unfair comparisons among hospitals and an increased workload for which electronic surveillance systems did not fully compensate. 21 The findings also confirm that, nationally, as was first noted in reports from that earlier California study, infection prevention has become an organizational goal toward which IPs lead interdisciplinary teams and that additional layers present in the new reporting structures can act as barriers to success. As in the present study, the California informants influenced practice through data feedback and education.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Uchida et al used 23 semi-structured interviews in six acute care hospitals to gain insight in current practice in infection control under mandatory surveillance and reporting [55]. They found themes on mandatory reporting, technology on HAI surveillance, role expansion, and impact of organizational climate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Time is successfully freed up for other HAIs prevention program activities, such as staff training, when HAIs are identified, tracked, and reported using an electronic system. However, we should not forget that not all problems can be solved with the electronic system, which is not a comprehensive solution to the HAIs problem ( 36 ). In addition to the lack of access to an effective electronic system, the low quality of materials, which was also mentioned in another study in Iran, also leads to the inability of some healthcare workers to comply with hygiene principles ( 19 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%