2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2018.06.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring impacts of land use characteristics in residential neighborhood and activity space on non-work travel behaviors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0
4

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
1
5
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…We employed a spatial–temporal aggregated predictor (STAP) modeling [ 24 ] to detect how associations between walkable destinations and transport walking varied across distances, and found that associations were negligible for distances larger than 0.25 km, which was in line with findings in a previous MESA study that smaller spatial scale of 0.2 km had stronger effects than larger ones [ 25 ]. Prior work among adults has widely used 1 km (equivalent to a 10–15 min walking distance) to represent the size of a residential neighborhood [ 8 , 11 , 20 , 23 ], and 5 km (~ 3.11 mile) represents the maximum distance because most US residents are unwilling to walk for transport farther that this [ 31 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We employed a spatial–temporal aggregated predictor (STAP) modeling [ 24 ] to detect how associations between walkable destinations and transport walking varied across distances, and found that associations were negligible for distances larger than 0.25 km, which was in line with findings in a previous MESA study that smaller spatial scale of 0.2 km had stronger effects than larger ones [ 25 ]. Prior work among adults has widely used 1 km (equivalent to a 10–15 min walking distance) to represent the size of a residential neighborhood [ 8 , 11 , 20 , 23 ], and 5 km (~ 3.11 mile) represents the maximum distance because most US residents are unwilling to walk for transport farther that this [ 31 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have suggested that urban attributes (e.g., urban development factors and urban facilities) play a more important role in shaping resident's health and SWB (27,34) than neighborhood attributes. On the one hand, people often travel from their neighborhoods to other neighborhoods for diverse reasons (e.g., working and shopping) (35). A study from Shanghai has suggested that both perceived residential and workplace environmental attributes can affect people's SWB by influencing commuting satisfaction and place satisfaction (36).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many researchers have explored how the built environment afects individual travel behavior [35][36][37][38]. Lucas studied the travel diary of adults in Merseyside, northwest England, and found that a person's actual location in the city had a greater impact on their travel mode than social factors such as family income, age, gender, and employment status [37].…”
Section: Associations Between the Built Environment And Travelmentioning
confidence: 99%