2009
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-03278-3_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring Heuristic Action Selection in Agent Programming

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In intelligent agents, preferences have been used for the selection [14,19] and elimination [15,17,18] of actions or plans. The preference language on which our work is based is also used by Fritz and McIlraith [10,11] to integrate preferences into the agent programming language DT-Golog.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In intelligent agents, preferences have been used for the selection [14,19] and elimination [15,17,18] of actions or plans. The preference language on which our work is based is also used by Fritz and McIlraith [10,11] to integrate preferences into the agent programming language DT-Golog.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hindriks et al [14] augment the specification of an agent program with utility values that provide heuristic guidance in the agent's selection of actions. Padgham and Singh [20] provide a mechanism for providing preference values for each plan which are evaluated dynamically at run time.…”
Section: Preferences In Intelligent Agentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Different works apply preference-based reasoning for controlling selection of plans in cognitive agents systems, but it has not been previously applied in the context of self-management as we do in this work [13,14,18,25]. The purpose of these works is to provide information to the agent in order to choose the appropriate plan for a given situation.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This leaves room for refinement of the programs in several ways (see, e.g. [20,4,21] for approaches that take advantage of this).…”
Section: Observation 9 [Number Of Executed Adopt or Drop Actions] In mentioning
confidence: 99%