2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.scienta.2022.111762
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring graft incompatibility markers: Intraspecific and interspecific grafts of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The greater TFM of ungrafted plants and with cherry tomato rootstock increases the economic return and is due to the use of the intact plant and a rootstock of the same species, with a high degree of kinship with the scion (Thomas et al, 2022). Tomato self-grafting and intraspecific grafts improved performance compared to interspecific ones due to plant physiological, biochemical and histological interactions (Babar et al, 2023).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The greater TFM of ungrafted plants and with cherry tomato rootstock increases the economic return and is due to the use of the intact plant and a rootstock of the same species, with a high degree of kinship with the scion (Thomas et al, 2022). Tomato self-grafting and intraspecific grafts improved performance compared to interspecific ones due to plant physiological, biochemical and histological interactions (Babar et al, 2023).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Disease-resistant or disease-tolerant rootstocks (Fullana et al, 2023;Rabelo et al, 2018), important in integrated management, can reduce production costs and are agroecologically correct (Ito et al, 2014). Tomato grafting, on domesticated or wild cultivars or plant species (Farias et al, 2013), can improve disease and pest management (Garita et al, 2018(Garita et al, , 2019Sabatino et al, 2013) without causing environmental impacts compared to other traditional control methods (Doñas-Uclés et al, 2014), in addition to improving product quality (Loos et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation