Exploring Faculty Perspectives during Emergency Remote Teaching in Engineering at a Large Public University

Abstract

In Spring 2020, the College of Engineering at San José State University (SJSU) conducted a comprehensive analysis of the impact of COVID-19 on faculty who were forced to transition to an online learning environment. The purpose of this study is to assess the impact of COVID-19 on faculty teaching methods, assessment methods, and personal well-being. The study was a combination of a quantitative survey and a qualitative study using interviews of engineering faculty teaching in Spring 2020. In the first part, we surveyed all faculty teaching during Spring 2020 in the SJSU College of Engineering about their experiences after the move to 100% online instruction in March 2020. In the second part of the research, we interviewed 23 faculty members to obtain a more in-depth understanding of their experiences during the move online in Spring 2020. Overall, 98 faculty participated in the survey: lecturers (58), tenure-track (18), tenured (13), adjunct (1), and Teaching Associates (1). The faculty reported being worried about their family and their students’ well-being. In addition, 65% of faculty members reported either a moderate or a great deal of stress related to the shelter in place, and this percentage was higher for female faculty (74%) and for tenure-track faculty (83%). Overall, faculty members felt that they had their classes under control most of the time and that the transition to online teaching was positive, even if they felt they had too much work to do and felt always in a hurry and under pressure. From a teaching perspective, the interviews highlight that faculty members’ main concerns focus on testing and assessment and students’ engagement. Overall, SJSU College of Engineering faculty members felt under stress in the transition to online teaching, especially the tenure-track faculty members, but were able to transition their classes with ease.

STEM Students’ Perceptions on Emergency Online Learning during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Challenges and Successes

“…This process contains three stages: (1) identifying desired results, (2) determining assessment evidence, and (3) planning instruction to enable students to succeed on the assessments. While faculty were concerned with the possibility that students would cheat on assessments in a virtual setting [23], student comments indicated that the focus on measures to prevent and detect cheating were ineffective, made assessments more difficult, and caused additional stress and anxiety. Many students indicated a desire for real-world contexts to be included in the lessons and topics, consistent with the findings of Means and Neisler [8].…”

“…One way to foster community is to create well-structured student groups that work on assignments both in class and out of class. During the pandemic, when all instruction was taking place at a distance, this was even more critical [2,5,8,19,22,23].…”

Impact of the Pandemic on the Teaching and Research Staff at a Technological University in Spain: Deepening the Gender Gap

“…The lockdown has caused teachers to be more attentive to the factors that cause variations in the teaching-learning results due to the adequacy of the resources available to the students, the suitability of the active learning methodologies used in each subject and the technological differences between academic fields [ 37 , 38 , 39 ]. In addition, there is the fact that much of the academic staff required levels of technological competence higher than those they had previously acquired and that some degrees were more difficult to adapt to online education [ 40 ].…”

Sustainable Development in Education from Students’ Perspective—Implementation of Sustainable Development in Curricula

“…The size of the population was 1384, i.e., the number of full-time students at the faculty in 2020. The margin of error coefficient was assumed at the level of 8%, analogous to the values adopted by the authors in other publications relating to the results of survey research [38,39]. Depending on the study, the confidence level usually amounts between 90% and 99%.…”