2021
DOI: 10.3390/molecules26175280
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring Effects of Protease Choice and Protease Combinations in Enzymatic Protein Hydrolysis of Poultry By-Products

Abstract: A study of the effects of single and combined protease hydrolysis on myofibrillar versus collagenous proteins of poultry by-products has been conducted. The aim was to contribute with knowledge for increased value creation of all constituents of these complex by-products. A rational approach was implemented for selecting proteases exhibiting the most different activity towards the major protein-rich constituents of mechanically deboned chicken residue (MDCR). An initial activity screening of 18 proteases on ch… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
(61 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 3 shows the proximate composition of fractions produced in optimal conditions after 4 h of hydrolysis with one enzyme and the combination of enzymes using the optimal process conditions. Lindberg et al [20] also found that the recovery yield was higher when the time of hydrolyses was increased from 1 h to 3 h; however, little improvement in recovery was observed beyond the 3 h time. There were no considerable differences in protein concentrations between the hydrolysate fractions prepared with ERM1 or ERM 1 + 2, and ERM 1 alone was effective.…”
Section: Mdcm Protein Hydrolysate Productionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Table 3 shows the proximate composition of fractions produced in optimal conditions after 4 h of hydrolysis with one enzyme and the combination of enzymes using the optimal process conditions. Lindberg et al [20] also found that the recovery yield was higher when the time of hydrolyses was increased from 1 h to 3 h; however, little improvement in recovery was observed beyond the 3 h time. There were no considerable differences in protein concentrations between the hydrolysate fractions prepared with ERM1 or ERM 1 + 2, and ERM 1 alone was effective.…”
Section: Mdcm Protein Hydrolysate Productionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The longer enzymatic treatment (72 h) of MDCM was found also more favorable to achieve higher hydrolysate yield (6.2-6.8%); correspondingly, the total gelatin recovery was also significantly influenced by the extraction temperature and time with close to a final recovery yield of 46%. Lindberg et al [20], on the other hand, determine that the optimal combination of different proteases might be a good way toward more profitable processing with an increase in yield of 15% in poultry byproduct valorization, making the process even more profitable. The model was verified by repeating the experiments twice within the optimal process parameters, and similar results were found for the protein concentration and recovery values.…”
Section: Mdcm Protein Hydrolysate Productionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Denatured collagen can be converted to gelatin by high temperature or treatment with strong acid, base or enzyme [80]. Dissolved in water, gelatin is a biocompatible and biodegradable polymer that forms a hydrogel with thermo-sensitive holding properties.…”
Section: Gelatinmentioning
confidence: 99%