Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2013
DOI: 10.14221/ajte.2013v38n10.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring Effects of High School Students’ Mathematical Processing Skills and Conceptual Understanding of Chemical Concepts on Algorithmic Problem Solving

Abstract: The purpose of the study was to examine the effects of students' conceptual understanding of chemical concepts and mathematical processing skills on algorithmic problem-solving skills. The sample (N = 554) included grades 9, 10, and 11 students in Turkey. Data were collected using the instrument "MPC Test" and with interviews. The MPC Test consists of 3 sections: 8 conceptual questions (Qcu), 8 algorithmic problems (Qcc), 8 mathematics questions (Qm). It was concluded that students' conceptual understanding an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
17
0
8

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
3
17
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Students are still used to do simple algorithmic problems that can be directly applied to the formula than about algorithmic need reasoning/analysis further. In accordance with the statement Cracolice, et al (2008) in Gultepe, et al (2013) that students are better able to solve problems using an algorithmic strategy rather than understand chemistry concepts that are manipulated into algorithmic. Stamovlasis, et al (2005) stated in his research that the simple algorithmic generate more value higher achievement than algorithmic questions at a higher level and more complex and conceptual questions.…”
Section: Improvement Of Model Student Learning Through the Content Ofsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…Students are still used to do simple algorithmic problems that can be directly applied to the formula than about algorithmic need reasoning/analysis further. In accordance with the statement Cracolice, et al (2008) in Gultepe, et al (2013) that students are better able to solve problems using an algorithmic strategy rather than understand chemistry concepts that are manipulated into algorithmic. Stamovlasis, et al (2005) stated in his research that the simple algorithmic generate more value higher achievement than algorithmic questions at a higher level and more complex and conceptual questions.…”
Section: Improvement Of Model Student Learning Through the Content Ofsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…Begitu juga dalam mempelajari kimia. Pada umumnya belajar kimia sulit bagi banyak siswa (Gultepe, 2013). Ada banyak faktor yang menghambat siswa belajar kimia yaitu, keterampilan yang memadai seperti algoritmik, struktur hirarkis konsep, buku teks, dan metode pembelajaran.…”
Section: Pendahuluanunclassified
“…In other words, the students with medium conceptual understanding would tend to be weak even though they had good procedural understanding. Gultepe, et al (2013) stated that conceptual understanding and processing ability in mathematics would influence problem solving ability; however, conceptual understanding had stronger role in reaching maximum result. This research result was also supported by Hiebert and Levefre's (1986) opinion, stating that children with procedural understanding might be more intelligent in solving problem.…”
Section: Subjectmentioning
confidence: 99%