2017
DOI: 10.1007/s11145-017-9797-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring early adolescents’ evaluation of academic and commercial online resources related to health

Abstract: for their valuable work with the data collection and data management.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
41
0
10

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
2
41
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…To isolate variance resulting from our experimental manipulation, we controlled for the potential effects of school, reading comprehension skills, prior knowledge, and interest in the topic because prior studies indicate that they may be linked to the evaluation and integration of multiple documents in early adolescence (e.g., Kiili, Leu, Marttunen, Hautala, & Leppänen, 2018;Macedo-Rouet et al, 2013;Paul et al, 2018).…”
Section: The Current Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…To isolate variance resulting from our experimental manipulation, we controlled for the potential effects of school, reading comprehension skills, prior knowledge, and interest in the topic because prior studies indicate that they may be linked to the evaluation and integration of multiple documents in early adolescence (e.g., Kiili, Leu, Marttunen, Hautala, & Leppänen, 2018;Macedo-Rouet et al, 2013;Paul et al, 2018).…”
Section: The Current Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, when students were presented with the controversy by means of two videos, the number of students defending the expert view in their responses almost doubled the number defending the commercial view. This effect is surprising, given that young students struggle to identify commercial information from the Internet as incredible, at least when it is presented in text (Kiili, Leu, Marttunen, et al, 2018).…”
Section: Source Trust and Multimodal Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…First, evaluation of information was divided into two components: confirming the credibility of information, and questioning the credibility of information. It seems that questioning a source that is, for example, biased or lacking in expertise, is more difficult for students than confirming the credibility of the source with relevant expertise (Kiili, Leu, Marttunen, Hautala, & Leppänen, 2018a;Pérez et al 2018). Second, synthesizing was divided into two separate components: identifying main ideas from a single online text, and synthesizing information across multiple online texts.…”
Section: Online Research and Comprehensionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, the students were asked to compose an email to the principal, in which they justified their opinion concerning the purchase of the energy drink vending machine. [For a more detailed description of the ILA test and the content of the online resources, see Kiili et al (2018aKiili et al ( , 2018b. The scoring rubric for the measured skills can be found in the Appendix.…”
Section: Online Research and Comprehensionmentioning
confidence: 99%