2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.aogh.2017.10.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring Drivers of Infant Deaths in Rural Rwanda Through Verbal Social Autopsy

Abstract: This study provides important information on the experiential quality of care received by infants and their caregivers within the current health care space in rural Rwanda. By listening to the individual stories of so many caregivers regarding the gaps and challenges they faced, appropriate action may be taken to bolster the existing health care system.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Out of these three studies, only one had a comparison group21 and three 21,26&34 had high recall-period. Similarly, table 3 shows that only three studies 33,35&40 out 16, have their VA component consistent with WHO recommendations 13 , despite the fact the none of them had listed the cause of death according to the ICD-10 classification except the one 40 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Out of these three studies, only one had a comparison group21 and three 21,26&34 had high recall-period. Similarly, table 3 shows that only three studies 33,35&40 out 16, have their VA component consistent with WHO recommendations 13 , despite the fact the none of them had listed the cause of death according to the ICD-10 classification except the one 40 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Similarly, table 3 shows that almost all of the studies except five 29,31,32,38&39 have incorporated separate sections for three different age groups in their VA tools. Only three studies 33,35&40 did follow ICD-10 classification for CoD certification and coding, however, none have mentioned that they followed the CoD list mapped according to ICD-10 except the one which used WHO's VA tool 40 . There is no marking criterion being set in the current review for selecting the best VA and SA study/ies that focused on three recommendations by WHO criteria and the number of social determinants mentioned in table 2 respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although VA has been used in nations with little resources, there is still a need to investigate a wider range of data on the societal factors that contribute to child mortality [3,6]. Hence, in a more recent timeframe, a concept of running through the missed mortality case with a VA and SA tool has been attempted in some countries (Cameroon [6,7], Mozambique [8], Niger [9][10][11], Uganda [12][13][14][15], Rwanda [16,17], Malawi [6], Nigeria [18], Guinea [19]) which helped to get detailed evidence of social causes of different medically assigned CoDs. However, these attempts made use of different VA and SA tools in combinations [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These barriers are common to low-and-middle income countries, 9 mainly in sub-Saharan Africa. 10,11 Although MISAU de ned policies to promote child health in primary care at Healthy and at Risk Children Services since 2011, 12 in the last decade, the low quality of maternal and child health (MCH) services in Mozambique, has hardly improved. 13 An assessment of quality and access to health care, in 195 countries in 2016, placed Mozambique in position 179.…”
Section: Plain English Summary Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%