2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.11.210
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring Drivers of Forest Degradation and Fragmentation in Sudan: The Case of Erawashda Forest and its Surrounding Community

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Another study found that there were 16.9% and 5.4% increases in bare land and large-scale mechanized agriculture, respectively, as well as a 37% decrease in dense forest cover and a 20% increase in light forest cover in the Erawashda Forest in eastern Sudan. The expansion of mechanized agriculture, the cutting of trees, grazing and construction were the main factors contributing to forest degradation [27].…”
Section: Factors Affecting Vegetation Coverage Along the Sudanese Coamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Another study found that there were 16.9% and 5.4% increases in bare land and large-scale mechanized agriculture, respectively, as well as a 37% decrease in dense forest cover and a 20% increase in light forest cover in the Erawashda Forest in eastern Sudan. The expansion of mechanized agriculture, the cutting of trees, grazing and construction were the main factors contributing to forest degradation [27].…”
Section: Factors Affecting Vegetation Coverage Along the Sudanese Coamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sulieman and Elagib [26] compared the temperature, rainfall and aridity index with land cover change in the El-Gedaref region in east Sudan and found an increase in warming and arid areas. Another study determined the factors affecting land cover change in the Erawashda Forest between 1973 and 2015 [27]. However, besides Sulieman and Elagib [26], few studies have investigated the changes in vegetation coverage with meteorological parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specific landscape metrics, such as largest patch index (LPI) and patch density (PD), have been considered robust for measuring fragmentation (Wang et al, 2014). Quantifying landscape structure with landscape metrics can be useful for acquiring spatially consistent findings, which provide biophysical processes driving landscape fragmentation (Sulieman, 2018). The use of simple metrics, instead of complex and usually correlated metrics is an unsettled issue of debate in landscape ecology studies (Bogaert et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the level of forest loss has lessened worldwide (FAO 2015), the issues of forest cover replacement still remains relevant at international meetings and conferences on global environment. Reliable and up-to-date information on the state of forest resources is necessary for land use planning and development (Sulieman 2018). A lot of researchers have emphasised the need for combining high resolution images, remote sensing data and aerial photography for understanding changes in land cover patterns (Brown et al 2000;Sader et al 2001;Sharma et al 2017;Sulieman 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reliable and up-to-date information on the state of forest resources is necessary for land use planning and development (Sulieman 2018). A lot of researchers have emphasised the need for combining high resolution images, remote sensing data and aerial photography for understanding changes in land cover patterns (Brown et al 2000;Sader et al 2001;Sharma et al 2017;Sulieman 2018). Land cover assessment has become an essential approach for environment and natural resources management towards effective land use and environmental policies (Forejt et al 2017;Grecchi et al 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%