2016
DOI: 10.1080/15230406.2016.1174886
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring differences of visual attention in pedestrian navigation when using 2D maps and 3D geo-browsers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

4
45
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
4
45
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, this sample size generally aligns with what has been used in many other eye-tracking studies investigating map reading [45,51,52,66] as well as wayfinding and pedestrian navigation [29,[69][70][71]. For example, Kiefer, Giannopoulos and Raubal [54] had 14 participants in their experiment match map symbols and landmarks in the real environment.…”
Section: Gender Differences and Its Implications To Map Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…However, this sample size generally aligns with what has been used in many other eye-tracking studies investigating map reading [45,51,52,66] as well as wayfinding and pedestrian navigation [29,[69][70][71]. For example, Kiefer, Giannopoulos and Raubal [54] had 14 participants in their experiment match map symbols and landmarks in the real environment.…”
Section: Gender Differences and Its Implications To Map Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We originally anticipated that both male and female attention could be biased towards the salient 3D landmarks. As found by Liao, Dong, Peng and Liu [29], participant attention was directed to 3D landmarks at the decision points. Davies and Peebles [31] demonstrated that the influence of the 3D visual salience was so strong that it led to ignorance of the optimal strategy for using the 2D layout.…”
Section: Gender Differences and Its Implications To Map Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations