Exploring development and evolutionary trends in carbon offset research: a bibliometric perspective

Wei, Jia; Zhao, Kai; Zhang, Linling; Yang, Ranran; Wang, Muxi

doi:10.1007/s11356-021-12908-8

Cited by 30 publications

(13 citation statements)

References 84 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The volume of articles published significantly increased by 243% in the last decade (2011)(2012)(2013)(2014)(2015)(2016)(2017)(2018)(2019)(2020); even in the recent 5 years (2016-2020), the growth rate was still more than 100%. This growth rate is in line with other studies such as Wei et al (2021), in which the number of articles published increased by 211% in the last decade and by over 90% in the recent 5 years. Therefore, concerning not only the emerging subject (Zeike et al, 2019) but also the increased rate of the number of articles during this period, this preliminary result suggests that the topic will continue to attract significantly more research.…”

Section: Initial Analysissupporting

confidence: 91%

Digital Leadership: A Bibliometric Analysis

Tigre

Curado

Henriques

2022

Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Digital disruption has changed organizations in an unprecedented way. The thriving field of digital leadership is expanding fast and few retrospective studies on this evolution have been made so far. This study presents a bibliometric and network analysis combining both Scopus and Web of Science databases to provide fresh insights into the evolution of the digital leadership research field. This study is based on a review of 79 publications from 57 journals, published between 2000 and 2020. The newness of the topic and the range of journals in which it is published confirms that digital leadership has gained interest from several different areas. Bibliometric analysis provides a description of the research field identifying the leading publishing journals, affiliation statistics, and most influential authors and expressive publications in the research field. Network analyses identify keyword evolution over time, co-citation relationships, and research clusters. Content analysis is used to identify key topics in the field with attention paid to interrelations among them. A brief description of each paper in the dataset and its methodological approach is provided. The results suggest that the topic will continue to attract more research, as it has not yet entered its maturity stage. This paper contributes to the literature by analyzing the relationship between digital leadership and e-leadership. This study also identifies the most leading digital leadership capabilities for a fast-changing world. Limitations and future avenues are also discussed.

show abstract

Section: Initial Analysissupporting

confidence: 91%

Digital Leadership: A Bibliometric Analysis

Tigre

Curado

Henriques

2022

Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…To protect our earth from the climate crisis, targets have been set to limit global warming to well below 2 0 C, preferably to 1.5 0 C, compared to pre-industrial levels. Sánchez et al, 2018;Huang et al, 2020;Uribe-Toril et al, 2019;Wang et al, 2021;Wei et al, 2021).…”

Section: Discussion Conclusion and Future Research Recommendationmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Publication fronts of some relevant literature reviews and meta-analyses are related to carbon storage estimation of forest ecosystem, the economics of forest carbon offsets, FCS cost studies, policy design for FCS, economics and policy of carbon sequestration, cost of carbon offsets, and economics of forest ecosystem carbon sinks (Richards and Stokes 2004;Van Kooten et al 2004;Van Kooten and Sohngen 2007;Bangsund and Leistritz 2008;Van Kooten and Johnston 2016;Gren and Zeleke 2016;Sun and Liu 2020). Further, there are studies (Nardi et al 2016;Uribe-Toril et al 2019;Omoregbe et al 2020;Yu et al 2020;Wei et al 2021) that have carried out bibliographic analysis also known as advanced statistic based science mapping by applying various bibliometric units let it be coauthorship, bibliographic coupling, co-citation, and co-occurrence analysis of key authors, documents, sources, references, institutions, countries, and keywords considering various research domains, i.e., payments for ecosystem services, carbon capture technologies for climate change mitigation, trends in carbon offset research, structure and evolution of forest research, etc. But to our knowledge, none of the studies has performed the bibliometric analysis on economics of forest carbon sequestration.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The economics of forest carbon sequestration: a bibliometric analysis

Verma

Ghosh

2023

Environ Dev Sustain

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Carbon sequestration in forests has increasingly captured the attention of scientists as a strategy for climate change mitigation and environmental sustainability. In this era of huge carbon emission, being a low-carbon and cost-effective technology, the economic analysis of forest carbon sequestration holds higher importance for the successful implementation and intended outcomes. This study elucidates a scientometric view of the research structure and thematic evolution of economic studies on forest carbon sequestration based on 1,439 articles over the time slice 2001-2021. The bibliographic data has been retrieved from the Dimensions database which accommodates a large coverage of research publications and also provides easy access to essential scholarly data and information. Vosviewer and Biblioshiny software tools have opted for visualization and evaluation purposes of bibliometric data. This study employs various measures of bibliometric analysis like co-authorship, bibliographic coupling, citation and keyword analysis to nd out the principal articles, authors, journals, most frequent keywords and highest publishing countries and institutions in this eld and the results show that the number of publications has escalated substantially in the last ve years, Popp A, 2017 (305 citations) and André P C Faaij (11 documents) are the most cited article and the most productive author, respectively, Bradford's law calculates 21 core journals out of total 503 journals among which Forest Policy and Economics is on the top, and the most productive country and institution are the USA and University of Florida, respectively.The study also investigates key publishing subject categories and the number of publications covered under each Sustainable Development Goals. The overall outcome of this bibliometric study confers an indepth understanding of the various dimensions of economic analysis on forest carbon sequestration, its development pattern in the last 20 years and also provides emerging themes for future references.

show abstract

“…Higher carbon prices of US$ 59-84/Mg CO 2 e at the village and catchment scales reflect challenges with restoring across continuous landscapes that include areas with marginal carbon returns after restoration. Carbon credit schemes to pay for the reduction or removal of carbon emissions from the atmosphere via avoided emissions and sequestration are increasingly being promoted (Wei et al 2021). Depending on the estimation method, costs for removing carbon vary substantially for different negative emission technologies.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Peatland restoration as an affordable nature-based climate solution with fire reduction and conservation co-benefits in Indonesia

Tan

Carrasco

Sutikno

et al. 2022

Environ. Res. Lett.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Ecosystem restoration is increasingly employed as a nature-based solution to a range of crises. Decisions over restoration must balance limited resources, land constraints, and competing demands. Peatlands in Southeast Asia have been heavily impacted by agricultural expansion over the past three decades, with Indonesia now accounting for a substantial proportion of degraded tropical peatlands globally. Using spatial linear programming, we focus on prioritizing peatland restoration sites in Indonesia for fire risk reduction, climate change mitigation, species conservation, and cost-effectiveness. The study finds that restoring peatlands at 1 km2 planning units can generate multiple co-benefits such as reduced fire risks by 6–37%, attenuated extinction risks of peatland specialist bird species and mitigated climate change potential of 0.002–0.36 Pg CO2e yr-1. These benefits were reduced but still of comparable magnitude when larger areas of planning (defined by village and catchment boundaries) were used. The results, although indicative, support tropical peatland restoration as a cost-efficient strategy for mitigating climate change, reducing fire, conserving biodiversity, and supporting sustainable development that can be offset by carbon prices of USD 2–37/Mg CO2e.

show abstract

Exploring development and evolutionary trends in carbon offset research: a bibliometric perspective

Cited by 30 publications

References 84 publications

Digital Leadership: A Bibliometric Analysis

Digital Leadership: A Bibliometric Analysis

The economics of forest carbon sequestration: a bibliometric analysis

Peatland restoration as an affordable nature-based climate solution with fire reduction and conservation co-benefits in Indonesia

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About