Exploring Conflict Resolution and Psychological Abuse Across Romantic Relationships

González-Méndez, Rosaura; Rojas-Solís, José Luis; Santana, Gustavo Mario Ramírez

doi:10.1080/10926771.2017.1327912

Cited by 5 publications

(9 citation statements)

References 41 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Lastly, the explanation that currently exists is that the lack of abilities to manage conflictive situations is a factor of vulnerability for recognizing the mechanics of an abusive relationship, and even for being able to cope with cases of this type [ 63 , 64 ]. Studies based on conflict resolution show that there are differences probably caused by age between adolescents and young adults, with the former showing a greater deficit in abilities, making it difficult to cope with conflicts due to inadequate emotion regulation or incapacity to perceive the consequences of their actions.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Relationships of Adolescent and Young Couples with Violent Behaviors: Conflict Resolution Strategies

Aguilera-Jiménez

Rodríguez-Franco

Rohlfs-Domínguez

et al. 2021

IJERPH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Violence in adolescent and young couples is a major issue given its high prevalence and the serious consequences that it brings. For this reason, this research has stated two main objectives. In the first place, to ascertain the level of agreement between both members of the couple both with regard to occurrence and frequency of violence. Second, to ascertain the level of agreement on the frequency of use of conflict resolution strategies in problematic situations in 141 heterosexual couples. The age of the sample was between 17 and 30. The tools used were the DVQ-R questionnaire and the Spanish adaptation by Bonache, Ramírez-Santana, and González-Mendez (2016) of the Inventory of Conflict Resolution Styles (CSRI)The results indicate that of the 141 couples in the sample, 112 were identified as violent, thus indicating a high prevalence of violence within their partner relationships. Regarding the levels of agreement and accordance, statistically significant discrepancies are reflected in the perception of violence between men and women, analyzing both roles (aggression and victimization). Finally, also noteworthy is use of the strategy of negative involvement in conflicts, with significant differences in relation to sex; it is the girls who make the most use of this strategy, and the high level of agreement on the frequency of problem-solving is reflected on that strategy.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Relationships of Adolescent and Young Couples with Violent Behaviors: Conflict Resolution Strategies

Aguilera-Jiménez

Rodríguez-Franco

Rohlfs-Domínguez

et al. 2021

IJERPH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Compared to romantic relationships in adulthood, teens report higher levels of conflictual interactions in their dating relationships ( Lantagne & Furman, 2017 ). Difficulties in solving these interactions have been associated with the escalation of conflicts, which in return can lead to the occurrence of violent behaviors ( De La Rue et al., 2017 ; Gonzalez-Mendez et al, 2018 ). Scholarly reports indicate that rates of dating violence (DV) are alarmingly high during adolescence ( Taylor & Mumford, 2016 ; Wincentak et al, 2016 ).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Interplay of Perceptions and Conflict Behaviors during Disagreements: A Daily Study of Physical Teen Dating Violence Perpetration

Fortin¹,

Paradis²,

Hébert³

et al. 2021

J Interpers Violence

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Physical dating violence (DV) is a widespread problem among adolescents. A growing body of literature demonstrates that physical DV often occurs during disagreements when partners use destructive conflict management strategies, such as conflict engagement (e.g., losing control, criticizing) or withdrawal (e.g., acting cold, being distant). However, little is known regarding how the individual daily variability on the use of destructive conflict management strategies can influence the probability of perpetrating day-to-day physical DV, especially if the other partner is also perceived as using destructive behaviors. Using an intensive longitudinal approach, the current study first aimed to examine the daily associations between the use of various conflict management strategies and physical DV perpetration in adolescent dating relationships. A second objective was to investigate if perceived partner’s conflict behaviors moderated the relation between self-reported conflict management strategies and day-to-day physical DV perpetration. A sample of 216 adolescents ( Mage = 17.03, SD = 1.49) involved in a dating relationship, completed a baseline assessment followed by 14 daily diaries. Results of multilevel logistic analyses revealed that using conflict engagement strategies significantly increased the probability of day-to-day physical DV perpetration. Furthermore, the probability of perpetrating physical DV was significantly higher on days in which teens reported using high levels of conflict engagement while also perceiving their partner as using high levels of conflict engagement or withdrawal. These findings yield new insights on the daily context in which disagreements might escalate into aggression. Evidence from this study further supports the conflict escalation pattern and the demand/withdraw communication pattern in the context of adolescent dating relationships. Preventive initiatives should address the interplay of perceptions and conflict behaviors concerning physical DV perpetration.

show abstract

“…Walaupun awalnya CRSI dikembangkan untuk mengukur resolusi konflik pada relasi pernikahan tetapi CRSI juga dapat digunakan untuk mengukur resolusi konflik pada berbagai konteks relasional selain relasi pernikahan. Misalnya para peneliti menggunakan CRSI pada konteks hubungan romantis (Bonache et al, 2019;Gonzalez-Mendez et al, 2018), hubungan anak-orang tua (Missotten et al, 2018), dan hubungan pertemanan (Gao et al, 2017). Selain itu, CRSI juga telah digunakan di beberapa negara di dunia seperti Amerika (Monk et al, 2021), Belanda (Ha et al, 2013;Yu et al, 2014), Belgia (Missotten, Luyckx, Vanhalst, et al, 2017), China (Gao et al, 2017), dan Spanyol (Bonache et al, 2019).…”

Section: Juga Mengembangkanunclassified

“…Meskipun demikian, penelitian sebelumnya telah menggunakan CRSI untuk mengukur empat gaya resolusi konflik ketika remaja menghadapi konflik dengan teman (Gao et al, 2017). Selain itu, temuan mengenai reliabilitas dari CRSI versi Indonesia kurang konsisten dengan penelitian sebelumnya yang melaporkan bahwa CRSI memiliki koefisien reliabilitas di atas 0,7 untuk keempat gaya resolusi konflik (Gonzalez-Mendez et al, 2018;Ha et al, 2013;Missotten et al, 2018;Yu et al, 2014). Walaupun penelitian ini telah berkontribusi melakukan pengujian validitas struktur internal dari CRSI pada konteks non-Barat tetapi penelitian ini tidak luput dari keterbatasan.…”

Section: Gambar 1 Struktur Faktor Dari Crsi Versi Indonesiaunclassified

Validitas struktur internal dari Conflict Resolution Styles Inventory versi Indonesia

Muttaqin

Dermawan

Wibaningrum

2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Conflict Resolution Styles Inventory (CRSI) merupakan alat ukur yang dapat digunakan untuk mengukur empat gaya resolusi konflik yang meliputi positive problem solving, withdrawal, conflict engagement, dan compliance. Namun, belum ada informasi properti psikometri dari CRSI pada konteks non-Barat khususnya di Indonesia. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menguji struktur internal CRSI versi Indonesia. Pengambilan data dilakukan dengan metode convenience sampling yang melibatkan 287 individu yang berusia 12-21 tahun. Struktur faktor, konsistensi internal, dan invariansi pengukuran dari CRSI versi Indonesia diuji dengan menggunakan analisis eksploratori faktor, analisis konfirmatori faktor, reliabilitas komposit, dan analisis multi-kelompok. Hasil analisis eksploratori faktor menghasilkan pengelompokan empat faktor sesuai dengan empat gaya resolusi konflik dan hasil analisis konfirmatori faktor menunjukkan model empat faktor memiliki ketepatan model yang cukup memuaskan. CRSI versi Indonesia memiliki konsistensi yang memuaskan pada pengukuran gaya resolusi konflik positive problem solving dan withdrawal sedangkan pada gaya resolusi konflik conflict engagement, dan compliance memiliki konsistensi yang kurang memuaskan. Selain itu, CRSI versi Indonesia tidak memiliki invariansi pengukuran ketika dibandingkan antara resolusi konflik dengan ayah, ibu, dan teman. Temuan penelitian ini mengindikasikan bahwa CRSI versi Indonesia dapat digunakan untuk mengukur empat gaya resolusi konflik pada sampel Indonesia. Namun, CRSI versi Indonesia tidak dapat digunakan membedakan resolusi konflik remaja ketika menghadapi konflik dengan ayah, ibu, dan teman.

show abstract

Exploring Conflict Resolution and Psychological Abuse Across Romantic Relationships

Cited by 5 publications

References 41 publications

Relationships of Adolescent and Young Couples with Violent Behaviors: Conflict Resolution Strategies

Relationships of Adolescent and Young Couples with Violent Behaviors: Conflict Resolution Strategies

The Interplay of Perceptions and Conflict Behaviors during Disagreements: A Daily Study of Physical Teen Dating Violence Perpetration

Validitas struktur internal dari Conflict Resolution Styles Inventory versi Indonesia

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About