Proceedings of the 22nd International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility 2020
DOI: 10.1145/3373625.3417024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring Collection of Sign Language Datasets: Privacy, Participation, and Model Performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 86 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to its visual medium, the collection of large-scale sign language corpora requires the storing of easily identifiable video data. Bragg et al suggests this introduces privacy concerns over data misuse, that significantly impacts the collection of sign language datasets [3].…”
Section: B Sign Language Video Anonymisationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Due to its visual medium, the collection of large-scale sign language corpora requires the storing of easily identifiable video data. Bragg et al suggests this introduces privacy concerns over data misuse, that significantly impacts the collection of sign language datasets [3].…”
Section: B Sign Language Video Anonymisationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Video effects of blackening [2] and pixelation [31] have been used to conceal sensitive information, which is unfeasible for extension to full data corpora. Bragg et al [3] suggest the use of greyscale or animoji filtering for video anonymisation, but neither provides full signer anonymity and both significantly impact sign comprehension. Focus groups with Deaf participants have suggested the use of actors or avatars to reproduce the data [38], but this requires labour-intensive work [20] and often results in non-realistic production [24].…”
Section: B Sign Language Video Anonymisationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations