1997
DOI: 10.1007/bf02511411
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring collaborative problem solving in adulthood

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As researchers have noted, in social settings, both social speech and externalized PS have task and regulatory functions (Centeno-Cortés and Jimenez 2004;De Guerrero 1994, 2004McCafferty 1994). Other studies have pointed out the relevance of social speech in adults while working in collaborative problem-solving tasks (Dixon et al 1997;Kimbler and Margrett 2009;Meegan and Berg 2002). In a collaborative situation, every statement, social and private, may have a regulatory role for the listener and the speaker, serving to focus the attention of the participants in the new information to solve the problem (Antón and DiCamilla 1998;DiCamilla and Antón 2004;Frawley and Lantolf 1985;Lantolf and Frawley 1984).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As researchers have noted, in social settings, both social speech and externalized PS have task and regulatory functions (Centeno-Cortés and Jimenez 2004;De Guerrero 1994, 2004McCafferty 1994). Other studies have pointed out the relevance of social speech in adults while working in collaborative problem-solving tasks (Dixon et al 1997;Kimbler and Margrett 2009;Meegan and Berg 2002). In a collaborative situation, every statement, social and private, may have a regulatory role for the listener and the speaker, serving to focus the attention of the participants in the new information to solve the problem (Antón and DiCamilla 1998;DiCamilla and Antón 2004;Frawley and Lantolf 1985;Lantolf and Frawley 1984).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further research is needed to investigate relationship quality as a potential mediating factor affecting the relation between training condition and cognitive outcome. Prior collaborative research suggests complex relationships between cognitive outcomes and both the nature of the partners' relationship (e.g., partner familiarity: Dixon, et al, 1997, Gould, et al, 1991, Gould, et al, 1994, Margrett & Marsiske, 2004partner gender: Margrett & Marsiske, 2002) as well as the collaborative interaction (e.g., Gould, et al, 1991, Gould, et al, 1994Kimbler, 2004). As noted by Carstensen, Levenson, and Gottman (1995) and Dixon and Gould (1996), the "expertise" developed in long-term relationships may facilitate the process and product of cognitive collaboration.…”
Section: Comparison Of the Two Training Groupsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Collaborative problem solving can be defined by the extent to which two or more people appraise, represent, and solve a variety of tasks together (e.g., discussing problem solutions or pooling resources in joint action [29]). Experimental studies looking at collaborative problem solving in married couples have shown that older adults who collaborate with their spouse typically achieve better outcomes as compared to individual performance or when collaborating with a same-aged stranger [17].…”
Section: Spousal Resources That Facilitate Healthy Lifestyles and Thementioning
confidence: 99%