Exploring collaboration technology use: how users’ perceptions twist and amend reality

Dulipovici, Alina; Vieru, Dragos

doi:10.1108/jkm-11-2014-0468

Cited by 8 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 39 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Also, TAM cannot be used as-is because do not take into account the nature of the knowledge shared [42]. Legris, Igham and Collerette (2003) show in their empirical study that the results of TAM have not been clear, particularly due to the lack of significance factors related to human and social processes [43].…”

Section: Technology Acceptance Model (Tam)mentioning

confidence: 99%

Models of Acceptance and Use of Technology Research Trends: Literature Review and Exploratory Bibliometric Study

Alturas

2021

Studies in Systems, Decision and Control

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Acceptance and Use of Technology Models suggest that some constructs predict behavioural intention towards the acceptance and use of technology. For this reason, these models are increasingly used by researchers around the world. At the same time, teachers of information technology and systems teach these models as part of the content of various courses. This study aims to analyse the publications of the last five years on Acceptance and Use of Technology Models. An exploratory bibliometric study was carried out, using the Proquest and Scopus platforms, in the period from 2014 to 2018, to find out which models are most used by researchers. The findings suggest that the number of articles into the top journals has increased, and that there is a wider array of journals publishing articles about this topic. Also, the study revealed that the most cited models were TPB and TAM.

show abstract

Section: Technology Acceptance Model (Tam)mentioning

confidence: 99%

Models of Acceptance and Use of Technology Research Trends: Literature Review and Exploratory Bibliometric Study

Alturas

2021

Studies in Systems, Decision and Control

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The former one BYOD refers to a policy that gives permission to employees to use their own devices and connect to a corporate network so that work-related tasks can be handled more effectively (Walterbusch et al ., 2017). BYOD is not considered a deviant behavior itself, however, it will prompt shadow IT since employees can freely use their personal devices and it is highly likely that they are used inappropriately (Dulipovici and Vieru, 2016).…”

Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning

confidence: 99%

Understanding Shadow IT usage intention: a view of the dual-factor model

Nguyen

2023

OIR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

PurposeDespite the growing concern about security breaches and risks emerging from Shadow IT usage, a type of information security violation committed by organizational insiders, this phenomenon has received little scholarly attention. By integrating the dual-factor theory, unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT) and social control theory, this research aims to examine facilitating and deterring factors of Shadow IT usage intention.Design/methodology/approachAn online survey was performed to obtain data. As this study aims at investigating the behavior of organizational insiders, LinkedIn, an employment-oriented network site, was chosen as the main site to reach the potential respondents.FindingsThe results show that while performance expectancy, effort expectancy and subjective norms considerably impact intention to use Shadow IT, personal norms and sanctions-related factors exert no influence. Besides, an organizational factor of ethical work climate is found to significantly increase individual perceptions of informal controls and formal controls.Originality/valueThis work is the first attempt to extend the generalizability of the dual-factor theory and UTAUT model, which primarily has been utilized in the context of system usage, to the new context of information security. This study is also one of few studies that simultaneously take both organizational and individual factors into consideration and identify its impacts on user's behaviors in the information security context.

show abstract

“…Collaboration technologies are defined as "combinations of technology, people and organizations thatfacilitate the communication and co-ordination necessary for a group to work together effectively" (Ramage, 1999).The literature with respect to the collaboration technologies is very scarce. Dulipovici and Vieru (2015) examine how a collaboration technology is used by three organizational groups. Their findingsreveal a process model which showshow social dynamics and users' perceptions of the capabilities of the collaboration technology to share the users' knowledge influence the users' behavior.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Impact of Collaboration Requirementson Firm Performance: An Empirical Examination in Turkey

Ada¹

2016

jshsr

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Collaboration is of great importance in today's global and challenging business environment. It goes without saying that organizations having successful collaboration efforts will be able to experience higher business value and performance. Today, collaboration in organizations is easier and more effective through the use of collaboration technologies. The objective of this study is to investigate whether or not collaboration requirements in businesses improve firm performance. In the context of this study, we use a previously developed conceptual model of collaboration, called Requirements for Collaboration Model, by Laudon and Laudon (2011) and test whether the relationships in this model empirically hold true. More specifically, we test whether collaboration capability and collaboration technology affect collaboration quality, and whether collaboration quality have an influence on firm performance. According to the results from this analysis, we empirically show that only the relationship between collaboration capability and collaboration quality is supported, while we could not find an empirical evidence in other relationships in the model.

show abstract

Exploring collaboration technology use: how users’ perceptions twist and amend reality

Cited by 8 publications

References 39 publications

Models of Acceptance and Use of Technology Research Trends: Literature Review and Exploratory Bibliometric Study

Models of Acceptance and Use of Technology Research Trends: Literature Review and Exploratory Bibliometric Study

Understanding Shadow IT usage intention: a view of the dual-factor model

The Impact of Collaboration Requirementson Firm Performance: An Empirical Examination in Turkey

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About