Exploring celebrity influence on public attitude towards the COVID-19 pandemic: social media shared sentiment analysis

Abstract

Objectives The COVID-19 pandemic has introduced new opportunities for health communication, including an increase in the public’s use of online outlets for health-related emotions. People have turned to social media networks to share sentiments related to the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic. In this paper, we examine the role of social messaging shared by Persons in the Public Eye (ie, athletes, politicians, news personnel, etc) in determining overall public discourse direction. Methods We harvested approximately 13 million tweets ranging from 1 January 2020 to 1 March 2022. The sentiment was calculated for each tweet using a fine-tuned DistilRoBERTa model, which was used to compare COVID-19 vaccine-related Twitter posts (tweets) that co-occurred with mentions of People in the Public Eye. Results Our findings suggest the presence of consistent patterns of emotional content co-occurring with messaging shared by Persons in the Public Eye for the first 2 years of the COVID-19 pandemic influenced public opinion and largely stimulated online public discourse. Discussion We demonstrate that as the pandemic progressed, public sentiment shared on social networks was shaped by risk perceptions, political ideologies and health-protective behaviours shared by Persons in the Public Eye, often in a negative light. Conclusion We argue that further analysis of public response to various emotions shared by Persons in the Public Eye could provide insight into the role of social media shared sentiment in disease prevention, control and containment for COVID-19 and in response to future disease outbreaks.

Factors associated with intention to be vaccinated with the COVID-19 booster dose: a cross-sectional study in Peru

“…This finding is significant, as Herrera-Añazco et al (2021a) said, the media usually give a lot of advertising space to politicians, which could be used to promote vaccination. In addition, a high influence of politicians on IBV has been reported in several studies ( Urrunaga-Pastor et al, 2021 ; Lazarus et al, 2021 ), however, this influence can be altered by several factors such as infodemic, doubts about vaccination, political instability, as well as the messages that politicians themselves post on their social networks ( Garcia et al, 2020 ; Borgesdo Nascimento et al, 2022 ; White et al, 2023 ; Malik et al, 2020 ). Therefore, it is suggested that politicians transmit information based on scientific evidence and promote vaccination campaigns adapted to the different realities of health access in each country.…”

Digital Personal Health Coaching Platform for Promoting Human Papillomavirus Infection Vaccinations and Cancer Prevention: Knowledge Graph-Based Recommendation System

“…Public opinions: online social media has been proven to be a valuable resource for vaccine attitude surveillance [ 39 ]. We intend to collect vaccine-related data from the Reddit information-sharing social media platform, which is composed of user-created communities (subreddits) in which members adhere to a set of regulations.…”

The Making of #CovidTwitter: Who Were the Loudest “Covid Influencers” and What Did They Say About the COVID-19 Pandemic?

“…In answering these questions, this study builds on existing social science studies of Twitter, media influencers, and information about COVID-19 (e.g., White et al, 2023). However, our unique focus on these elite influencers and our combined quantitative and qualitative approach to data analysis contributes new insights into elite influencer-or "Covid Influencers" as we call them here-voices beyond individual media celebrities or politicians who generated narrative content and suggested material responses to the COVID-19 pandemic.…”