2018
DOI: 10.1186/s12916-018-1119-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring causality in the association between circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D and colorectal cancer risk: a large Mendelian randomisation study

Abstract: BackgroundWhilst observational studies establish that lower plasma 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25-OHD) levels are associated with higher risk of colorectal cancer (CRC), establishing causality has proven challenging. Since vitamin D is modifiable, these observations have substantial clinical and public health implications. Indeed, many health agencies already recommend supplemental vitamin D. Here, we explore causality in a large Mendelian randomisation (MR) study using an improved genetic instrument for circulating … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
54
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
(87 reference statements)
1
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2.0–2.9 μg in non‐users. Furthermore, recent studies have examined vitamin D receptor polymorphisms and risk of colorectal diseases and found different results for different disease entities, and a large Mendelian randomization study provides no evidence for a causal relationship between vitamin D and risk of colorectal cancers, although small effect sizes and non‐linear relationships cannot be ruled out. Like our study, none of these studies had information on potential confounding factors such as smoking habits, alcohol consumption, body fatness, physical activity or family history of cancer.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…2.0–2.9 μg in non‐users. Furthermore, recent studies have examined vitamin D receptor polymorphisms and risk of colorectal diseases and found different results for different disease entities, and a large Mendelian randomization study provides no evidence for a causal relationship between vitamin D and risk of colorectal cancers, although small effect sizes and non‐linear relationships cannot be ruled out. Like our study, none of these studies had information on potential confounding factors such as smoking habits, alcohol consumption, body fatness, physical activity or family history of cancer.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…The renal cancer analysis used summary statistics from the Kidney Cancer GWAS Meta-Analysis Project of 10,784 cases of renal cell carcinoma and 20,406 controls 76 . Colorectal cancer summary statistics were from eight UK-based GWAS studies, totalling 22,372 colorectal cancer cases and 44,271 controls 77,78 . The summary statistics for overall lung cancer were from GWAS analyses of 29,266 lung cancer cases and 56,450 controls conducted by the International Lung Cancer Consortium 79 .…”
Section: Integration With Cancer Data and Modelling Loy As A Causal Ementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies demonstrate an inverse correlation between colorectal cancer and 25VD levels [58,59]. The findings do not correspond to the results of a larger Vitamin D Deficiency study, detecting no significant association between colorectal cancer and VD status [60]. Unfortunately, the data from interventional trails with VD supplementation also have conflicting result for the effect of VD on colorectal cancer prevention and survival improvement [44,61].…”
Section: Colorectal Cancermentioning
confidence: 89%