2018
DOI: 10.29333/ejmste/93190
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring Bimodality in Introductory Computer Science Performance Distributions

Abstract: This study examines student performance distributions evidence bimodality, or whether there are two distinct populations in three introductory computer science courses grades at a four-year southwestern university in the United States for the period 2014-2017. Results suggest that computer science course grades are not bimodal. These findings counter the double hump assertion and suggest that proper course sequencing can address the needs of students with varying levels of prior knowledge and obviate the doubl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, this area of research has been the focus of both researchers and practitioners for many decades (Teo et al, 2019). There are several technology acceptance models that have been proffered to understand the process of technology adoption (Doleck et al, 2017a;Dwivedi et al, 2017): TRA, TAM, TPB, MPCU, IDT, and the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) model. These models…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, this area of research has been the focus of both researchers and practitioners for many decades (Teo et al, 2019). There are several technology acceptance models that have been proffered to understand the process of technology adoption (Doleck et al, 2017a;Dwivedi et al, 2017): TRA, TAM, TPB, MPCU, IDT, and the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) model. These models…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Improving the academic results of CS1 courses can reduce student attrition, increase graduation rates, and increase the supply of qualified workers in scientific and technological fields to meet the growing demand. A wealth of research in computer science education has sought to explain why some students perform better than others in CS1 courses (Basnet et al, 2018;Guzdial, 2019;McCartney et al, 2017;Patitsas et al, 2019). One hypothesis for academic failure in CS1 courses relates to the cumulative nature of the materials and posits the existence of "stumbling points" in the learning path of programming: that is, there is a small number of identifiable skills and concepts that can have a major impact on a student's progress (Ahadi & Lister, 2013).…”
Section: Academic Failure In Cs1mentioning
confidence: 99%