2023
DOI: 10.1007/s10995-023-03622-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring Barriers to Healthy Eating Among Women in Their Role as New Mothers with a Theory-Driven Questionnaire

Abstract: Objectives This study aims to propose and evaluate a theory-driven questionnaire addressing barriers to healthy eating among mothers of young children. Methods Statements drawing upon the Social Cognitive Theory were developed/gathered based on literature review and previous qualitative research. Part I (43 items) included general barriers, attitudes to nutrition advice and outcome expectations. Part II (9 items) included subjective knowledge and general s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 38 publications
(51 reference statements)
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Research consistently indicates that people of low socioeconomic status are more likely to have poorer health outcomes, exhibiting lower adherence to healthy eating patterns and demonstrating reduced engagement in physical activity. The results of this study, in conjunction with evidence from other studies, indicate the significance of targeting individuals with low socio-economic status as an important target group for implementing lifestyle interventions [42].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…Research consistently indicates that people of low socioeconomic status are more likely to have poorer health outcomes, exhibiting lower adherence to healthy eating patterns and demonstrating reduced engagement in physical activity. The results of this study, in conjunction with evidence from other studies, indicate the significance of targeting individuals with low socio-economic status as an important target group for implementing lifestyle interventions [42].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%