2022
DOI: 10.1080/08039488.2022.2100929
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring associations between the Modular Assessment of Risk for Imminent Suicide (MARIS) questionnaire and recent suicidal ideation and behavior among patients admitted at an acute psychiatric inpatient department

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A total of 37 articles from 2010 to 2022 were identified by search criteria and considered in detail. Sixteen of these articles were excluded from further analysis because of the following reasons: eight studies used the Suicide Trigger Scale as an instrument (Cohen et al., 2018; Hawes et al., 2017; Høyen et al., 2021, 2022; Yaseen et al., 2010, 2012, 2014, 2016), three studies only evaluated single dimensions of the SCS (Li et al., 2017; Rogers, Cao, et al., 2021; Yaseen et al., 2017), three studies did not assess STB as an outcome (Bloch‐Elkouby, Gorman, Schuck, et al., 2020; Molaie et al., 2019; Ying et al., 2021), and two studies were not written in English (Chang et al., 2022; Vespa et al., 2021). Twenty‐one articles were included in the systematic review (see Table 3).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A total of 37 articles from 2010 to 2022 were identified by search criteria and considered in detail. Sixteen of these articles were excluded from further analysis because of the following reasons: eight studies used the Suicide Trigger Scale as an instrument (Cohen et al., 2018; Hawes et al., 2017; Høyen et al., 2021, 2022; Yaseen et al., 2010, 2012, 2014, 2016), three studies only evaluated single dimensions of the SCS (Li et al., 2017; Rogers, Cao, et al., 2021; Yaseen et al., 2017), three studies did not assess STB as an outcome (Bloch‐Elkouby, Gorman, Schuck, et al., 2020; Molaie et al., 2019; Ying et al., 2021), and two studies were not written in English (Chang et al., 2022; Vespa et al., 2021). Twenty‐one articles were included in the systematic review (see Table 3).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…25 Measures of the SCS have also been validated in multiple countries and in multiple languages. 24,[27][28][29] Furthermore, SCS symptoms were more tightly linked to stressful life events experienced during the pandemic than were SI. 10 Suicide Risk During the Pandemic Unsurprisingly, a number of studies have shown an increase in suicide risk during the pandemic.…”
Section: The Suicide Crisis Syndrome (Scs)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…25 Measures of the SCS have also been validated in multiple countries and in multiple languages. 24,27–29 Furthermore, SCS symptoms were more tightly linked to stressful life events experienced during the pandemic than were SI. 10…”
Section: The Suicide Crisis Syndrome (Scs)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, the SCS demonstrated incremental predictive validity over suicidal ideation regarding suicidal attempts (Rogers et al, 2022). The SCS has been employed in numerous research and clinical settings, both in the United States and internationally (c.f., Høyen et al, 2022; Menon et al, 2022; Otte et al, 2020; Wu et al, 2022).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%