2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2010.01.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring and mitigating social loafing in online communities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
70
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
2
70
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, qualitative data obtained through in-depth interviews with actual users would help clarify the underlying psychological rationale for findings in this study and thereby enrich their theoretical implications. Despite arguments surrounding the inevitability or triviality of lurking in relation to online community sustainability (e.g., Bishop, 2007;Jones, Ravid, & Rafaeli, 2004;Preece & Shneiderman, 2009;Shiue, Chiu, & Chang, 2010), an online community's vitality depends on the richness and diversity of the information and support that it can provide its users. This ideal of online communities can be fulfilled by having a large number of users who share a wide range of perspectives and experiences via discussions on various topics.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, qualitative data obtained through in-depth interviews with actual users would help clarify the underlying psychological rationale for findings in this study and thereby enrich their theoretical implications. Despite arguments surrounding the inevitability or triviality of lurking in relation to online community sustainability (e.g., Bishop, 2007;Jones, Ravid, & Rafaeli, 2004;Preece & Shneiderman, 2009;Shiue, Chiu, & Chang, 2010), an online community's vitality depends on the richness and diversity of the information and support that it can provide its users. This ideal of online communities can be fulfilled by having a large number of users who share a wide range of perspectives and experiences via discussions on various topics.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They report that participation is usually a factor of the community type; and that the common reasons behind participation include information exchange, social support and friendship. Social loafing, a theory that shows the effect of group size on an individual's motivation to contribute [29], has been observed in online communities [51]. Researchers have looked at factors affecting participation in specific online communities.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This reinforced the fact that community participation is mainly driven by member's attitude and action rather than the provider. Other theories such as social presence theory, social loafing, and social network theory have been also used to examine the impact of different social factors on community participation (Shiue et al, 2010;Cheung et al, 2011;Lee et al, 2011).…”
Section: And !mentioning
confidence: 99%