2006
DOI: 10.1197/jamia.m1761
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring and Developing Consumer Health Vocabularies

Abstract: Laypersons ("consumers") often have difficulty finding, understanding, and acting on health information due to gaps in their domain knowledge. Ideally, consumer health vocabularies (CHVs) would reflect the different ways consumers express and think about health topics, helping to bridge this vocabulary gap. However, despite the recent research on mismatches between consumer and professional language (e.g., lexical, semantic, and explanatory), there have been few systematic efforts to develop and evaluate CHVs.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
174
0
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 224 publications
(180 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
4
174
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…They also report differences in search behavior based on the lower and higher levels of domain knowledge (analogous to the difference between consumers and professionals). There are also notable terminological differences between consumers and professionals, which has led to the development of terminologies specifically for consumers, 5 although some domains have more overlap than others. 6 Not all questions have easily accessible answers: in a 2004 survey, 97 subjects found answers to 30% of their questions and partial answers to another 33% in MedlinePlus and other related websites.…”
Section: Background and Significancementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They also report differences in search behavior based on the lower and higher levels of domain knowledge (analogous to the difference between consumers and professionals). There are also notable terminological differences between consumers and professionals, which has led to the development of terminologies specifically for consumers, 5 although some domains have more overlap than others. 6 Not all questions have easily accessible answers: in a 2004 survey, 97 subjects found answers to 30% of their questions and partial answers to another 33% in MedlinePlus and other related websites.…”
Section: Background and Significancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…25 To highlight certain facets of medical language, 2 views of UMLS were employed: (a) semantic types grouped into PROBLEM, TREATMENT, and TEST and (b) individual terminologies in MeSH (http://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/), SNOMED-CT, 26 and the Consumer Health Vocabulary. 5 Question Decomposition Many questions were paragraphs containing several subquestions. For instance, Figure 1 (a) shows a WEBC question containing at least 6 subquestions.…”
Section: Semantic Typesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reviewers also encouraged us to consider whether terminology used in the text was difficult for a reader to interpret or whether it reflected or incorporated consumer health vocabulary. 28 Finally, they encouraged us to consider as part of our assessment of "suitability" and "comprehensibility" whether the information provided in the materials was factually correct.…”
Section: Content Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Without consumer friendly terms, consumers can misinterpret medical information by filling in the gaps on their own [15].…”
Section: Consumer Health Information Vocabularymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zeng & Tse [15] discuss the development of consumer health vocabularies (CHVs), which represent terms commonly used by a given consumer group to express health related topics. They argue that research requires such CHVs to be able to facilitate consumers' understanding of health information.…”
Section: Consumer Focused Vocabulary Initiativesmentioning
confidence: 99%