2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2016.09.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring and assessing meaning in life in elementary school children: Development and validation of the meaning in life in children questionnaire (MIL-CQ)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The scale assesses the child’s satisfaction with his or her life as a whole using a seven-point Likert scale, ranging from strongly disagree (1) to strongly agree (7). A previous study provides evidence for good reliability and validity of the Hebrew version of the scale ( Shoshani and Russo-Netzer, 2017 ). In this study, the SWLS-C yielded a satisfactory Cronbach’s alpha (alpha coefficient = 0.77).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The scale assesses the child’s satisfaction with his or her life as a whole using a seven-point Likert scale, ranging from strongly disagree (1) to strongly agree (7). A previous study provides evidence for good reliability and validity of the Hebrew version of the scale ( Shoshani and Russo-Netzer, 2017 ). In this study, the SWLS-C yielded a satisfactory Cronbach’s alpha (alpha coefficient = 0.77).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Items are scored on a 3-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (not true) to 3 (certainly true). The Hebrew version of the inventory used in this study has demonstrated excellent criterion validity for children ( Mansbach-Kleinfeld et al, 2010 ; Shoshani et al, 2016a ; Shoshani and Russo-Netzer, 2017 ). The Cronbach’s alpha coefficients for the subscales in this study ranged from 0.73 to 0.87.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This subscale includes five items (e.g., “I share readily with other children, for example toys, treats, pencils”) and participants rated how much each items described them best, using a 3-point scale, ranging from 1 ( not true ) to 3 ( certainly true ). Previous studies have provided evidence on the reliability and validity of this subscale (e.g., Goodman et al, 1998; Mansbach-Kleinfeld et al, 2010; Shoshani et al, 2016; Shoshani and Russo-Netzer, 2017). In the current study, Cronbach Alphas were acceptable (from 0.69 to 0.74) at the three time points.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The intervention constructed and implemented in the present study was based on this model, adjusted for applicability to young children. Due to the difficulty in conceptualizing and facilitating meaning among young children ( Shoshani and Russo-Netzer, 2017 ), the element of meaning was not included in the present intervention program.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%