2020
DOI: 10.1080/08961530.2020.1763886
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring Age Effects on Children’s Preferences of Package Design: Curvilinearity, Figurativeness, and Complexity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To test H1 and H2, four separate logistic regressions were conducted with preference for curved package design as the dependent variable (DV) and independent variables (IVs) including age group (3-6 years vs 7-12 years), culture and age group  culture interaction. As shown in Table II, age group is consistently significant for all four stimuli (p = 0.000 for three stimuli and 0.007 for one stimulus), echoing previous findings that children prefer curved package design more when they get older (Zhang, 2018). However, the culture effect is found to be significant for only two stimuli (p = 0.000 for Stimulus 1 and 0.001 for Stimulus 4), and surprisingly, counter to the prediction of H1, American children showed greater preference for curved package design (Figure 1).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…To test H1 and H2, four separate logistic regressions were conducted with preference for curved package design as the dependent variable (DV) and independent variables (IVs) including age group (3-6 years vs 7-12 years), culture and age group  culture interaction. As shown in Table II, age group is consistently significant for all four stimuli (p = 0.000 for three stimuli and 0.007 for one stimulus), echoing previous findings that children prefer curved package design more when they get older (Zhang, 2018). However, the culture effect is found to be significant for only two stimuli (p = 0.000 for Stimulus 1 and 0.001 for Stimulus 4), and surprisingly, counter to the prediction of H1, American children showed greater preference for curved package design (Figure 1).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…To test H3 and H4 , generalized linear model (GLM) method was used owing to the mixed nature of the variables, with age as continuous and culture as categorical (McCullagh and Nelder, 1989). The reason we treated age as a continuous variable lies in the finding of a recent study which reveals partial support for an inverted-U relation between children’s preference for figurative package design and age (Zhang, 2018). Accordingly, we first conducted a series of full models for completeness of the tests, with preference for figurative package design as DV and age 2 , age, culture, age 2 × culture and age × culture as IVs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations