“…We focused on studies in the US and Canada in large part because opposition to new active travel facilities has often been fierce in those two countries (Bubbers, 2019;Chapple et al, 2018;Sadik-Khan, 2016), making this research particularly relevant and useful for planners and policymakers there. In addition, a preliminary review of our search records indicated that the vast majority of relevant English-language studies were done in the US and Canada, which is unsurprising given the relative surge in active travel projects (and accompanying opposition) there compared to European countries with more established active travel facilities (Kornas, Bornbaum, Bushey, & Rosella, 2017;Pucher, Buehler, & Seinen, 2011).…”