2018
DOI: 10.18608/jla.2018.53.6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploratory versus Explanatory Visual Learning Analytics: Driving Teachers’ Attention through Educational Data Storytelling

Abstract: From a human-centred computing perspective, supporting the interpretation of educational dashboards and visualizations by the people intended to use them exposes critical design challenges that may often be trivialized. Empirical evidence already shows that "usable" visualizations are not necessarily effective from an educational perspective. Since an educator's interpretation of visualized data is essentially the construction of a narrative about student progress, in this paper, we propose the concept of "Edu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…ENA results and subjective responses of the teachers both confirmed that in this condition, they were out of control, and they could not make announcements to the class regarding time, phase transitions, and student participation during the activity. Given the small number of teachers participating in our study, we take these findings as early indications that having access to orchestration tools that visualize information about collaboration and provide a means for guiding collaboration become beneficial for orchestration (Wise & June 2019;Echeverria et al, 2018;Schwarz et al, 2021). The post-activity questionnaire responses from the teachers also confirmed that having access to the dashboard provided awareness and control regarding collaboration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…ENA results and subjective responses of the teachers both confirmed that in this condition, they were out of control, and they could not make announcements to the class regarding time, phase transitions, and student participation during the activity. Given the small number of teachers participating in our study, we take these findings as early indications that having access to orchestration tools that visualize information about collaboration and provide a means for guiding collaboration become beneficial for orchestration (Wise & June 2019;Echeverria et al, 2018;Schwarz et al, 2021). The post-activity questionnaire responses from the teachers also confirmed that having access to the dashboard provided awareness and control regarding collaboration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…When students and practitioners engage with a dashboard, they typically do so with specific tasks in mind, and may only need certain information in specific contexts. These ideas generally align with a best practice around minimalism and supporting the ability for users to tell a story with the data (Williams, 2015;Alhadad, 2018;Echeverria et al, 2018). This idea of storytelling also speaks to the importance of supporting multiple interpretations of the data as well as avoiding generalizations and equating causation with correlation (Alhadad, 2018).…”
Section: Educational Dashboards and Human-centred Learning Analyticsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…More recent work has explicitly broader consideration of the different stakeholders within learning analytics (Alhadad, 2018;Teasley, 2015;Echeverria et al, 2018). Researchers have drawn attention to bridging between the theoretical and the practical.…”
Section: Educational Dashboards and Human-centred Learning Analyticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Upcoming studies include investigations of off-task behavior (e.g., [ 67 ]) and self quantification of students in distance education at home. Finally, a data storytelling dashboard on the multimodal data should benefit students and instructors in the superficial analysis of behavior and context across learning (e.g., [ 68 ]).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%