“…Previous studies reported different injection doses (0.5 mL [ 24 , 32 ], 1.0 mL [ 21 , 31 , 34 ], 1.5 mL [ 21 , 34 ], and 2.0 mL [ 7 , 12 , 14 , 21 , 23 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 33 , 35 , 36 ] of injection volume) and injection sites (peritumoral [ 32 ], intratumoral [ 24 ], or periareolar or subareolar [ 7 , 12 , 14 , 21 , 23 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 ]) have noninferior detection efficiency compared with the standard method. The SLN detection rate per patient was constantly comparable to the standard method, which was also unaffected by SPIO dose [ 21 , 30 ]; a 0.5 mL volume of SPIO was sufficient for SLN identification [ 37 ]. This finding is consistent with the current subgroup analysis, nevertheless, high doses (2.0 mL of injection volume) of SPIO still reported a superior performance compared to the standard method in detecting more SLNs ( Figure 5 ).…”