2000
DOI: 10.2514/2.2706
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploratory Study of Aircraft Wake Vortex Filaments in a Water Tunnel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many researchers speculate that wandering is a consequence of either wind-tunnel effects (Corsiglia et al 1973;Devenport et al 1996;Beresh et al 2010) or a self-induced vortex instability (Rokhsaz et al 2000;Jacquin et al 2001). Wandering persists at zero angle of attack, indicating that it occurs despite the presence of a vortex (Baker et al 1974), which may suggest that the motion is independent of the vortex itself and may be a result of the wind-tunnel environment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many researchers speculate that wandering is a consequence of either wind-tunnel effects (Corsiglia et al 1973;Devenport et al 1996;Beresh et al 2010) or a self-induced vortex instability (Rokhsaz et al 2000;Jacquin et al 2001). Wandering persists at zero angle of attack, indicating that it occurs despite the presence of a vortex (Baker et al 1974), which may suggest that the motion is independent of the vortex itself and may be a result of the wind-tunnel environment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They concluded that the vortex core in their experiments was laminar and that velocity fluctuations in the vortex core region were entirely due to wandering. Rokhsaz (2000) investigated wandering of a tip-vortex from a rectangular flat plate airfoil in a water tunnel and showed that wandering increased with angle of attack and therefore vortex strength, the opposite to the finding of Devenport et al (1996) who showed a 15% reduction in wandering amplitude with an increase in vortex strength of 85%.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…The errors were larger for lower angles of attack. They also found that the wandering amplitude increases linearly with streamwise distance; a linear reduction was found by increasing the angle of attack, so that they concluded that the mechanism responsible for wandering is not self-induced, as had been proposed by Rokhsaz et al (2000), but rather that the vortex is responding to an external perturbation, as for instance the background turbulence level, to which the tip vortex becomes less susceptible as the vortex strength is increased.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They concluded that the vortex core in their experiments was laminar and that velocity fluctuations in the vortex core region were entirely due to wandering. Rokhsaz et al (2000) investigated wandering of a tip-vortex from a rectangular flat plate airfoil in a water tunnel and showed that wandering increased with angle of attack and therefore vortex strength, the opposite to the finding of Devenport et al (1996) who showed a 15% reduction in wandering amplitude with an increase in vortex strength of 85%.…”
Section: Overviewmentioning
confidence: 85%