Exploratory Innovation, Exploitative Innovation, and Performance: Effects of Organizational Antecedents and Environmental Moderators

Abstract

Research on exploration and exploitation is burgeoning, yet our understanding of the antecedents and consequences of both activities remains rather unclear. We advance the growing body of literature by focusing on the apparent differences of exploration and exploitation and examining implications for using formal (i.e., centralization and formalization) and informal (i.e., connectedness) coordination mechanisms. This study further examines how environmental aspects (i.e., dynamism and competitiveness) moderate the effectiveness of exploratory and exploitative innovation. Results indicate that centralization negatively affects exploratory innovation, whereas formalization positively influences exploitative innovation. Interestingly, connectedness within units appears to be an important antecedent of both exploratory and exploitative innovation. Furthermore, our findings reveal that pursuing exploratory innovation is more effective in dynamic environments, whereas pursuing exploitative innovation is more beneficial to a unit's financial performance in more competitive environments. Through this richer explanation and empirical assessment, we contribute to a greater clarity and better understanding of how ambidextrous organizations coordinate the development of exploratory and exploitative innovation in organizational units and successfully respond to multiple environmental conditions.organizational learning, performance, coordination mechanisms, exploration/exploitation

Performance Perspectives for Small and Medium Enterprises in Cameroon: Innovation and ICTs

“…Detailed attention has therefore been given to innovation in recent years by business economics theorists (Mairesse et al, 2002;Charreaux, 2004;Raymond and St-Pierre, 2010;Şipoş et Ionescu, 2015;Rukevwe, 2015;Boachie, 2015;Ndesaulwa, 2016). Some authors find a positive link between the degree of innovation and company performance (Seersucker et al, 2000;Jansen et al, 2006;Dibrell et al, 2008 ;Hajjem et al, 2015), while others (Tidd & Driver, 2000;St-Pierre et al, 2003) obtain mitigated results. Faced with the absence of a consensus on the relationship between innovation and performance in the literature, a mastery of Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) in production units remains a major stake to improve this relationship within firms.…”

Farming system design for innovative crop-livestock integration in Europe

“…'Exploitative' innovations correspond to practices which can be observed and for which enough cases exist to build some references. Alternatively, 'explorative' innovations can be defined as practices of real pioneers or unachieved ideas (Jansen et al, 2006). Hill and MacRae (1995) propose a classification of innovation according the degree of change in the farming system through their 'efficiencysubstitution-redesign' framework.…”

The evolving nature of China's regional innovation systems: Insights from an exploration–exploitation approach

“…However, there are still other studies that conceptualize the two constructs, exploration and exploitation, as independent activities and thus utilize separate measurements [56,82,83]. As Stadler et al [78] note, this conceptualization might underrate their interdependent nature, which lies at the heart of the question of how a balance can be obtained.…”