2014
DOI: 10.1175/jcli-d-13-00387.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploratory High-Resolution Climate Simulations using the Community Atmosphere Model (CAM)

Abstract: Extended, high-resolution (0.23° latitude × 0.31° longitude) simulations with Community Atmosphere Model versions 4 and 5 (CAM4 and CAM5) are examined and compared with results from climate simulations conducted at a more typical resolution of 0.9° latitude × 1.25° longitude. Overall, the simulated climate of the high-resolution experiments is not dramatically better than that of their low-resolution counterparts. Improvements appear primarily where topographic effects may be playing a role, including a substa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

30
265
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 193 publications
(296 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
30
265
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In each case, very little resolution sensitivity was seen, consistent with other resolution sensitivity studies (Bacmeister et al 2014). …”
Section: Interannual and Intraseasonal Variabilitysupporting
confidence: 89%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In each case, very little resolution sensitivity was seen, consistent with other resolution sensitivity studies (Bacmeister et al 2014). …”
Section: Interannual and Intraseasonal Variabilitysupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The increase in precipitation over India in the MetUM is consistent with the resolution sensitivity of the annual precipitation range over India in the CMIP3 models (Kim et al 2008). In other resolution sensitivity studies using individual GCMs, orographic rain bands over India tend to become more well defined, but the sign of precipitation changes over India are highly variable (Sperber et al 1994;Stephenson et al 1998;Delworth et al 2012;Sabin et al 2013;Bacmeister et al 2014). This is also true within MetUM configurations.…”
Section: Robustness Of Resolution Sensitivity To Gcm Differencessupporting
confidence: 78%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Recent advancements in high performance computing represent an exciting opportunity for global climate model development, pushing the limits of representing clouds and convection in a global atmospheric model [Chen and Lin, 2011;Dirmeyer et al, 2012;Manganello et al, 2012;Murakami et al, 2012;Bacmeister et al, 2014;Wehner et al, 2014]. As a consequence, atmospheric moist convection can now be represented in sophisticated schemes such as global cloud-resolving models and super parameterization schemes [Grabowski, 2001;Khairoutdinov and Randall, 2001;Randall et al, 2003;Tomita and Satoh, 2004;Satoh et al, 2008Satoh et al, , 2014Stan et al, 2010].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%