2018 7th IEEE International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics (Biorob) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/biorob.2018.8488028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploratory Evaluation of the Force Myography (FMG) Signals Usage for Admittance Control of a Linear Actuator

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

6
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The proposed control scheme in this paper evaluated machine learning techniques in real time, and comparable estimation accuracies (approximately 88-89% averaged across all motions) were obtained with FMG signals, which were in affiliation with the literature. The accuracies of these estimators were higher in 1-DoF in the x-direction, which were 94% and 92% for the SVR and the KRR, respectively; these results were comparable with the reported accuracies of 90% and 92% for the SVR and the KRR, respectively, when one participant interacted with a linear actuator in the x-axis using the FMG technique [50]. The performances of the estimators gradually descended with the increased complexity of 2-DoF arm motion patterns, although being reasonably efficient in real-time interactions.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…The proposed control scheme in this paper evaluated machine learning techniques in real time, and comparable estimation accuracies (approximately 88-89% averaged across all motions) were obtained with FMG signals, which were in affiliation with the literature. The accuracies of these estimators were higher in 1-DoF in the x-direction, which were 94% and 92% for the SVR and the KRR, respectively; these results were comparable with the reported accuracies of 90% and 92% for the SVR and the KRR, respectively, when one participant interacted with a linear actuator in the x-axis using the FMG technique [50]. The performances of the estimators gradually descended with the increased complexity of 2-DoF arm motion patterns, although being reasonably efficient in real-time interactions.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…This layer consists of two neurons: a numerator neuron that is the summation of weighted target values; and the denominator neuron which is the summation of weight values. The mathematical representation is the following [36,40]:…”
Section: Regression Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The three regression algorithms that were assessed for this study are amongst the most vastly used for regression purposes for FSR signals used in biomedical applications [8,[35][36][37]. Linear machine learning algorithms are commonly used for various types of signals for a multitude of applications due to their capability of prediction and their computational efficiency [9,35,38,39].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While most of the works related to human-machine-interface were aiming at applications that utilized an open-loop control strategy, researchers also started to investigate FMG in scenarios that involved dynamic interaction between the user’s hand and external robotic devices. For instance, an exploratory study by Sakr et al showed that FMG could be used for admittance control applications [40]. In this study, a handler connected to a linear actuator could react to the applied force predicted from FMG sensors located on both the distal and proximal ends of the forearm.…”
Section: Fmg Signal Acquisitionmentioning
confidence: 99%