Exploratory case studies on manufacturing decision areas in the job production system

Abstract

Purpose -The purpose of this paper is to understand the configuration of a job production system with reference to manufacturing decision areas. The aim is to identify the process specific decisions for job shop and the non-process specific decisions that are influenced by other contextual factors. Design/methodology/approach -A case study research approach is used in the present paper to investigate the decisions of five manufacturing companies that satisfy the characteristics of job production system. Data are collected from case company's products, order winners and choices made in manufacturing decision areas. The paper uses within case and cross-case analysis to identify various patterns in the data, with a view to meeting the required research objectives. Findings -The present paper identifies a number of decisions specific to job shop. Further, many non-process specific decisions are seen to be influenced by competitive priorities (order winner), strategic orientation of manufacturing (stages in H-W model), top management and size of the company. After the study of the case companies, it is also observed that the companies employing a job production system may have high product complexity. Practical implications -The findings derived from this research would facilitate practitioners in understanding both process specific and non-process specific decisions for the job production system. The observation that the job shops can also use progressive practices, the same as other shops, to gain competitive advantage in the market could be very useful for practicing managers. Originality/value -This exploratory research contributes to the existing theory in manufacturing decision areas for job production systems.

Competitive Priorities and Innovation in SMEs: A Brazil Multi-Case Study

“…To Choudhari et al (2012), the fundamental goal of a research that uses case studies is to decrease the distance between theory and practice, making the research useful for practitioners.…”

“…However, several authors (Hayes and Wheelwright, 1984;Hill 1989;Hayes and Pisano, 1994;Voss, 1995;Ward and Duray, 2000;Peña and Garrido, 2008;Peng et al, 2011;Choudhari et al, 2012) assert the importance of manufacturing strategy in the organizational context.…”

Manufacturing strategy implementation and performance benchmarking in Indian packaging product manufacturing companies

“…The issue of manufacturing strategy is studied in literature as process based (Choudhari et al, 2012) and non-process based decision making (Dangayach and Deshmukh, 2001;Swink et al, 2007). The process specific decision is directly related with production system for ex.…”

Homogeneity of manufacturing choices in subcontractor SMEs

“…Koc and Bozdag (2007) investigated how the use of computer numerically controlled (CNC) machines in manufacturing SMEs could enhance competitive priorities and their performance. Some studies have included both SMEs and larger companies, and their results have been independent of company size (e.g., Choudhari et al, 2012a;2012b). Choudhari et al (2012aChoudhari et al ( , 2012b investigated the relationship between decision categories, process choices and specific factors of non-process choices (e.g., product complexity, strategic orientation in manufacturing, top management and size).…”

“…According to Sousa and Voss (2008), the manufacturing strategy contingency paradigm requires internal and external consistency between manufacturing strategy choices in order to increase performance (see, e.g., Hayes and Wheelwright, 1984). According to Choudhari et al (2012bChoudhari et al ( , p. 1338, "It is essential to understand how … factors affect decision choices in order to develop a sound manufacturing strategy. "…”