2019
DOI: 10.1515/opli-2019-0036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Explorations of Engagement: Introduction

Abstract: The paper explores engagement as a linguistic category by discussing its defining characteristics. Following work by Evans and colleagues (2018a, b), we discuss issues of scope and the intersubjective distribution of information, as central to the definition of engagement. In addition, we examine the notion of access as a crucial component of engagement marking and we attempt to distinguish access from epistemic authority, which we argue is a prerequisite for the existence of engagement as a linguistic categor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Trevarthen (1979, p. 347) concedes that "intersubjectivity is not a graceful word, but it does specify the linking of subjects who are active in transmitting their understanding to each other." Evans et al (2018a) highlight the importance of intersubjectivity in the context of human language and communication: "Achieving intersubjectivity thus lies at the heart of how human communication systems evolved" (p. 3; see also Bergqvist & Knuchel, 2019;Verhagen, 2007).…”
Section: Intersubjectivity As the Basis Of Cscmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Trevarthen (1979, p. 347) concedes that "intersubjectivity is not a graceful word, but it does specify the linking of subjects who are active in transmitting their understanding to each other." Evans et al (2018a) highlight the importance of intersubjectivity in the context of human language and communication: "Achieving intersubjectivity thus lies at the heart of how human communication systems evolved" (p. 3; see also Bergqvist & Knuchel, 2019;Verhagen, 2007).…”
Section: Intersubjectivity As the Basis Of Cscmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, mental-state verbs pose high metarepresentational demands (e.g., consider the difference between "Sally knows the marble is in the basket" vs. "Sally thinks the marble is in the basket"), without being more important for successful communication (or social navigation) than other parts of language. As Evans et al (2018aEvans et al ( , 2018bBergqvist & Knuchel, 2019) have recently pointed out, human languages offer rich ways to track, compare, and engage the attentional and epistemic states of interlocutors through grammatical categories such as deixis and evidentiality-what they call the grammar of engagement.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…{confirming} Shi-/shaare used to signal the speaker's acknowledgment of the addressee as primary knower, but at the same time encodes the speaker's assertion (without reduced certainty) of a talked-about event. In Kogi, we thus find two semantic parameters that pertain to the notion of engagement; firstly, there is the parameter of accessibility (see Bergqvist and Knuchel 2019), which can be shared or nonshared between the speaker and the addressee, secondly, there is the notion of epistemic authority, which warrants the separation between na-/niand sha-/shiinto speaker and addressee-perspective forms. This separation foreshadows the notion of egophoric marking below, which encodes the involvement of the speechact participants and the resulting epistemic authority from such involvement (see Section 3.1).…”
Section: Adrasym-dance=beloc-1smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As stated in Section 2, engagement signals the assumed sharedness/nonsharedness between the speech-act participants with respect to any aspect of epistemicity, such as belief, perceptual/cognitive access, and involvement (Bergqvist and Knuchel 2019;Bergqvist and Kittilä 2020). While ju and (to a lesser extent), väl, have been defined by their function to qualify the truth content of a proposition (e.g., Aijmer 1977Aijmer , 1996Eriksson 1988;Teleman et al 1999;cf.…”
Section: Ju and Väl In The Cg-corpusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Diessel argues that coordinating speaker-listener joint attention is one of the most basic functions of language, which also links demonstratives to social cognition. Building on extensive typological work by Diessel (1999Diessel ( , 2006 and colleagues (2018a, 2018b;Bergqvist & Knuchel, 2019), I have recently argued that demonstratives are a lynchpin for the development of social cognition, training young children in spatial perspective taking (Rubio-Fernandez, 2020).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%