2017
DOI: 10.1007/s00894-017-3329-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploration of the binding affinities between ecdysone agonists and EcR/USP by docking and MM-PB/GBSA approaches

Abstract: Ecdysone receptor (EcR) is a significant target in the identification of new environmentally friendly pesticides. There are two types of ecdysone agonists: steroidal ecdysone agonists and dibenzoylhydrazines (DBHs). In this study, various modeling methods (homology modeling, molecular docking, MD simulation, binding free energy calculation, and per-residue binding free energy decomposition) were utilized to study the different binding mechanisms of two types of ecdysone agonists. Our theoretical results indica… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
(45 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Models of the honeybee and Varroa Octβ2R-LBD were built using the Molecular Operating Environments (MOE, 2015.10) using the β2-adrenergic receptor and carazolol-bond crystal structures (PDB ID: 5D5A) as homology templates as described (Hu et al, 2017). The models were evaluated using Ramachandran plots and the UCLA-DOE server.…”
Section: Molecular Dockingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Models of the honeybee and Varroa Octβ2R-LBD were built using the Molecular Operating Environments (MOE, 2015.10) using the β2-adrenergic receptor and carazolol-bond crystal structures (PDB ID: 5D5A) as homology templates as described (Hu et al, 2017). The models were evaluated using Ramachandran plots and the UCLA-DOE server.…”
Section: Molecular Dockingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, the binding free energy was calculated for each protein ligand complex. In addition, Poisson-Boltzmann surface area continuum solvation (MM/PBSA) (Fu et al, 2018;Hu et al, 2017;Kumari et al, 2014;Moesgaard et al, 2020;Xue et al, 2018) was also performed to calculate the free binding energy of the ligand. Distance of 3.2 Å was kept as cutoff for bond length for salt bridge and hydrogen bond interactions (Mohammad et al, 2020;.…”
Section: Simulations Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The overall time of simulation was 20 ns, time necessary for ligand stabilization inside the binding cleft. Indeed, 10-20 ns is the average time needed for the ligand to reorient itself inside the pocket prior its dynamical evolution [58][59][60] . In fact, as it results from RMSD graphs (see Supplementary Information), all the ligand-protein complexes reach a steady state (average deviation RMSD=0.37±0.02) starting from an initial different orientation thus supporting that 10-20 ns is a reasonable time in this case.…”
Section: Ensemble Docking Via High Throughput Virtual Screening (Htvs...mentioning
confidence: 99%