2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jglr.2015.09.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploration of spatial variability in nearshore water quality using the first Great Lakes National Coastal Condition Assessment survey

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many surface and groundwater pollution problems are related to excess nutrients derived from agricultural production practices (Ritter et al, 2002;Kelly et al, 2015;Liang et al, 2014). Preferential flow in agricultural soils can directly and significantly contribute to many of these pollution burdens (Gärdenäs et al, 2006;Ulén et al, 2014).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many surface and groundwater pollution problems are related to excess nutrients derived from agricultural production practices (Ritter et al, 2002;Kelly et al, 2015;Liang et al, 2014). Preferential flow in agricultural soils can directly and significantly contribute to many of these pollution burdens (Gärdenäs et al, 2006;Ulén et al, 2014).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2). First we defined the nearshore as a well-mixed zone, distinct from the stratified offshore and where longshore currents dominate, and is often thought to be the approximate depth limit of tributary influence (Yurista et al 2012(Yurista et al , 2016Kelly et al 2015;Scharold et al 2015;Wang et al 2015). We defined the extent of the nearshore zone as <30 m depth Fig.…”
Section: Bathymetrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The directional (alongshore) current was defined as occurring from the 5 m isobaths to either the 30 m isobaths (15 m in Lake Erie) or 5 km from the high-resolution shoreline, whichever distance was greater (Table 3; Fig. 2) based on a compilation of studies and information describing circulation patterns (Beletsky et al 1999;Rao and Schwab 2007;Kelly et al 2015;C. Troy, Purdue University, personal communication, 2015).…”
Section: Mechanical Energymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specific pollutants (pollution caused by all major pollutants; pollution caused by other substances discharged into the water) USA Nutrients (total nitrogen and total phosphorus,); dissolved oxygen, temperature, pH, turbidity, buffer capacity, salinity, mercury content in sediment Japan COD or BOD (the amount of organic matter excreted in human daily life); transparency; fecal coliforms; ammonia nitrogen; odor; dissolved oxygen Landscape and recreation index Europe USA Fishing; swimming Japan Landscape (feel) (whether the waterside landscape is coordinated); visual (whether the garbage is heaped by the water); touch (do you feel good when you touch the bottom of the river); smell (whether the water smells good); hearing (whether the sounds heard by the water are comfortable); geographical resources of history and culture (whether there is history and culture related to the river evaluation, whether it is developed); difficulty and easiness of being near water (whether it is safe and easy to be near water); utilization of residents (whether walking around the lake, or carrying out recreational activities); economic activities (whether it is used for tourism, industrial and agricultural water, shipping, etc. ); environmental activities (whether residents and other people use the evaluated river to carry out water environment learning and conservation activities) river basin organizations have put forward some evaluation index systems and evaluation methods [7][8][9][10][11][12]. In LE security evaluation, the domestic researches pay attention to the ecological health and service function security of lakes and emphasize the harmony between people and water.…”
Section: Usamentioning
confidence: 99%