2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2017.01.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploration of scaling effects on coarse resolution land surface phenology

Abstract: Numerous land surface phenology (LSP) datasets have been produced from various coarse resolution satellite data and different detection algorithms from regional to global scales. In contrast to field-observed phenological events that are defined by clearly evident organismal changes with biophysical meaning, current approaches to detecting transitions in LSP only determine the timing of variations in remotely sensed observations of surface greenness. Since activities to bridge LSP and field observations are ch… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

4
89
2
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 158 publications
(98 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
4
89
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results also hint at a systematic bias toward earlier timing of maturity and senescence of grass and shrub/scrub cover types ( Figures 5 and 6), which is not caused by inadequate density of observations in either time series but rather the enhanced capacity for tracking phenology using moderate resolution data than has been previously possible with coarser resolution data (e.g., MODIS). This finding agrees with those of references [18,36], where phenological transition dates (i.e., green-up, start-of-season, and maturity) extracted from Landsat time series were generally earlier than those from derived from MODIS and Visible Infrared Imaging Radiometer Suite (VIIRS) phenocurves. Others have also found a two-week lag when comparing MODIS NDVI to flux tower gross photosynthesis in rangeland ecosystems [37].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Our results also hint at a systematic bias toward earlier timing of maturity and senescence of grass and shrub/scrub cover types ( Figures 5 and 6), which is not caused by inadequate density of observations in either time series but rather the enhanced capacity for tracking phenology using moderate resolution data than has been previously possible with coarser resolution data (e.g., MODIS). This finding agrees with those of references [18,36], where phenological transition dates (i.e., green-up, start-of-season, and maturity) extracted from Landsat time series were generally earlier than those from derived from MODIS and Visible Infrared Imaging Radiometer Suite (VIIRS) phenocurves. Others have also found a two-week lag when comparing MODIS NDVI to flux tower gross photosynthesis in rangeland ecosystems [37].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…an increase in predominantly moisture limited areas over the study period ( figure S3). Finally, it should be noted that our 50% threshold for excluding croplands is unlikely to exclude the effects of crop phenology in the detected LSP entirely (Zhang et al 2017). Moreover, our analysis did not take into account land-use/landcover changes and fire, which may have large annual effects on land surface phenology (Forkel et al 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The scale effects between 500 m and 4.6 km, as well as different determinations of SOS and different representations of vegetation growth cycles by NDVI and MTCI, likely explain these differences. First, the SOS at a coarse resolution was possible to simulate by selecting the date at the 30th percentile SOS at finer resolution [39], resulting in the advanced SOS at a coarse resolution. Second, the SOS in the MERIS phenology product was identified using the first derivative value from negative to positive (valley point), whereas the SOS in the GLOBMAP-IndianSOS product was determined from the date when NDVI exceeded 9.18% of VGA.…”
Section: Comparison With the Meris Phenology Productmentioning
confidence: 99%