2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.animal.2022.100556
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploration of robustness indicators using adaptive responses to short-term feed restriction in suckling primiparous beef cows

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Within a parameter and feeding period, the means with a different letters (x,y,z) denote differences due to lactation month (P < 0.05). mildly affected by a short feed restriction, similarly to the − 4 to − 5% BW loss reported after a 4-day 50% DMI restriction in beef cows (De La Torre et al, 2022) and dairy cows (Ferraretto et al, 2014;Kvidera et al, 2017). This BW loss could be linked with the decrease in DMI, gut fill loss and mobilisation of body reserves (Gross et al, 2011a;Laeger et al, 2012).…”
Section: Cow Performancementioning
confidence: 71%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Within a parameter and feeding period, the means with a different letters (x,y,z) denote differences due to lactation month (P < 0.05). mildly affected by a short feed restriction, similarly to the − 4 to − 5% BW loss reported after a 4-day 50% DMI restriction in beef cows (De La Torre et al, 2022) and dairy cows (Ferraretto et al, 2014;Kvidera et al, 2017). This BW loss could be linked with the decrease in DMI, gut fill loss and mobilisation of body reserves (Gross et al, 2011a;Laeger et al, 2012).…”
Section: Cow Performancementioning
confidence: 71%
“…Incomplete BW recovery in the 4-day refeeding phase implies that a longer recovery period is needed; e.g. 10 days in beef cows after a similar restriction to that herein applied (De La Torre et al, 2022) or at least 1 to 2 weeks in dairy cows with severer restrictions that cause greater BW loss (− 10%; Billa et al, 2020;Pires et al, 2019).…”
Section: Cow Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous studies have analysed the adaptations of lactating ruminants to feed restriction in different phases. Within-animal responses are repeatable between early-and mid-lactation in dairy cows (Gross and Bruckmaier, 2015), between consecutive lactations in dairy goats (Friggens et al, 2016) and between two consecutive feeding challenges of different duration in beef cattle (De la Torre et al, 2022), which indicate that variability may be genetically driven. Here, we clustered cows according to their response throughout lactation and analysed the month of lactation separately, finding a strong effect on most response variables.…”
Section: Effect Of the Lactation Stagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This individual variability has been addressed in cows by testing different models to quantify the gap between the potential and disturbed performance that natural or induced perturbations cause (Codrea et al, 2011;Bjerre-Harpøth et al, 2012;Adriaens et al, 2021;De La Torre et al, 2022) as an indicator of not only animals' resilience but also their capacity to be minimally affected by perturbations and to rapidly return to the previous state (Berghof et al, 2019). When disturbances happen during lactation, complex homeostatic and homeorhetic mechanisms concur to maintain a physiological equilibrium while redirecting nutrient partitioning towards milk production (Bauman and Currie, 1980).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%