Exploration of relational factors: Sino-foreign joint venture partnering

Abstract

Purpose -Despite recent threats of economic contraction, China still offers attractive opportunities for foreign companies seeking to expand their business activities through joint venturing (JV) partnering entry strategies. Recent research has indicated a growing recognition of the importance of relational factors in JV partnering. The purpose of this paper is to build on recent research findings that identify critical relation success factors in JVs and explores these in the context of a Hong Kong-based civil aviation services company seeking to expand business activities in Greater China. Design/methodology/approach -While the extant management literature focuses primarily on factors relevant to the inter-partner relationship between partners in the formation stage of a joint venture, this research takes a dynamic stakeholder perspective in respect of the relevant relational factors over the evolution of a partnership. The research described in this paper is based on a case-based study that identifies and examines the relevance and importance of uniquely Chinese factors such as guanxi, renqing and mianzi in the specific context of a strategic partnering relationship. Findings -This phenomenological study provides empirical evidence of critical linkages of these to intrinsically Chinese notions of guanxi, mianzi and renqingit links these to key strategic partnering success factors identified to be trust, conflict resolution, commitment and cooperation. This study thereby reinforces the importance of the uniquely Chinese relational context in cross-border JVs. Moreover, the research findings suggest that these factors underpin the dynamic bi-directional stakeholder relationship in a Sino-foreign strategic partnership. Originality/value -This study conceptually links the uniquely Chinese relational factors (guanxi, mianzi and renqing) to key success factors supporting the establishment of a strategic partnership in a Sino-foreign context; moreover, it contributes empirical evidence substantiating the proposed conceptual linkage.

Stakeholder pressure and innovation capacity of SMEs in the COVID-19 pandemic: Mediating and multigroup analysis

“…In the empirical research, we showed that process innovation, together with organizational innovation, management innovation, and human resources innovation, create social and business value. As explained in the literature, we confirm the importance of implementing innovation management that merges various types of innovation rather than merely optimising each kind of innovation separately ( O’Regan and Ghobadian, 2004 ; Lau and Tovstiga, 2015 ).…”

Driving innovation management to create shared value and sustainable growth

“…In the empirical research, we show that process innovation, together with organisational innovation, management innovation and human resources innovation, create social and business value. As explained in the literature, we confirm the importance of implementing innovation management that merges the various types of innovation rather than merely optimising each kind of innovation separately (O' Regan and Ghobadian 2004;Lau and Tovstiga 2015). Designing new products and/or services stemming from innovation management offers new market opportunities that are beneficial for both the firm as well as for society, thereby generating CSV (Corazza et al 2017;Obsuwan et al (2021).…”

Market orientation heterogeneity and new joint venture formation announcements: creating value for parent firms

“…This eliminated international JVs, domestic JVs with more than two partners, and JVs with private firms. Our findings may also differ if they were studied in countries other than the US: for example, the success of a JV in China may be greatly influenced by culturally-based relational factors (Lau and Tovstiga, 2015) Furthermore, the sole use of S&P 500 firms is a limitation, as our results may not be generalizable to firms of smaller size.…”