Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies 7 2005
DOI: 10.1016/b978-008044704-9/50200-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploration of public acceptance regarding CO2 underground sequestration technologies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Shackley et al (2004) found in England that attitudes started off slightly negative but became slightly positive after additional information about CCS was presented. In Japan, Itaoka et al (2004), Uno et al (2004), and Tokushige et al (2004) found support for CCS in general, but not if it were to be locally situated, with additional information about CCS leading to increased support. Australian researchers found that on average, Queensland residents felt that CCS was a promising technology (cLET, 2006), while in Sweden, a majority of survey respondents were open to using CCS to address climate change .…”
Section: Previous Researchmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Shackley et al (2004) found in England that attitudes started off slightly negative but became slightly positive after additional information about CCS was presented. In Japan, Itaoka et al (2004), Uno et al (2004), and Tokushige et al (2004) found support for CCS in general, but not if it were to be locally situated, with additional information about CCS leading to increased support. Australian researchers found that on average, Queensland residents felt that CCS was a promising technology (cLET, 2006), while in Sweden, a majority of survey respondents were open to using CCS to address climate change .…”
Section: Previous Researchmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Previous research into public attitudes toward CCS has used a variety of methodologies, including individual interviews and focus groups (Huijts, 2003;Shackley et al, 2004;Palmgren et al, 2004;Uno et al, 2004;Tokushige et al, 2004), and large statistically significant surveys (Curry, 2004;Itaoka et al, 2004;Reiner et al, 2006). While smaller scale interviews and focus groups can allow a more thorough investigation of the thought processes contributing to attitudes about CCS, their small scale reduces the applicability of their findings to a larger audience.…”
Section: Previous Researchmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Only the Opponent group favors rejection. Existing research on public perceptions of geologic sequestration shows that the public is largely unaware of the technology, and, when made aware of it, is neutral to negative about it (Sharp 2000, Curry 2004, Uno et al 2004, Palmgren et al 2004.…”
Section: Conclusion and Preliminary Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%